期刊论文详细信息
BMC Cancer
High-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue to treat stage III homologous deficient breast cancer: factors influencing clinical implementation
Research Article
Agnes Jager1  Vincent M. T. de Jong2  Sabine C. Linn3  Hanna M. Wijnja4  Valesca P. Retèl5  Joost G. E. Verbeek5  Wim H. van Harten5 
[1] Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands;Department of Molecular Pathology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;Department of Molecular Pathology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;Department of Pathology, Utrecht University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands;Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands;
关键词: Breast Neoplasms;    Homologous Recombination;    Drug Therapy;    Translational Research;    Qualitative Research;    Implementation Science;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12885-022-10412-x
 received in 2022-03-01, accepted in 2022-12-05,  发布年份 2022
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundHigh-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue (HDCT) is a promising treatment for patients with stage III, HER2-negative, homologous recombination deficient (HRD) breast cancer. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are currently under investigation in an international multicenter randomized controlled trial. To increase the chance of successful introduction of HDCT into daily clinical practice, we aimed to identify relevant factors for smooth implementation using an early comprehensive assessment framework.MethodsThis is a qualitative, multi-stakeholder, exploratory research using semi-structured interviews guided by the Constructive Technology Assessment model, which evaluates the quality of a novel health technology by clinical, economic, patient-related, and organizational factors. Stakeholders were recruited by purposeful stratified sampling and interviewed until sufficient content saturation was reached. Two researchers independently created themes, categories, and subcategories by following inductive coding steps, these were verified by a third researcher.ResultsWe interviewed 28 stakeholders between June 2019 and April 2021. In total, five overarching themes and seventeen categories were identified. Important findings for optimal implementation included the structural identification and referral of all eligible patients, early integration of supportive care, multidisciplinary collaboration between- and within hospitals, (de)centralization of treatment aspects, the provision of information for patients and healthcare professionals, and compliance to new regulation for the BRCA1-like test.ConclusionsIn anticipation of a positive reimbursement decision, we recommend to take the highlighted implementation factors into consideration. This might expedite and guide high-quality equitable access to HDCT for patients with stage III, HER2-negative, HRD breast cancer in the Netherlands.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202305115910791ZK.pdf 1171KB PDF download
Fig. 1 240KB Image download
12888_2022_4500_Article_IEq3.gif 1KB Image download
MediaObjects/12888_2022_4500_MOESM1_ESM.docx 19KB Other download
Fig. 1 88KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 1

12888_2022_4500_Article_IEq3.gif

Fig. 1

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:10次 浏览次数:3次