Transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy in detection of prostate cancer: a retrospective study based on 452 patients

BMC Urology

Research

Yongzhi Wang¹  Mengxin Lu¹  Hang Zheng¹  Zhonghua Yang¹  Jingtian Yu¹  Yi Luo¹ 

[1] Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, 430071, Wuhan, Hubei, China;

关键词: Transrectal biopsy;    Transperineal biopsy;    Prostate cancer;    Cancer detection rate;    Positive rate of biopsy cores;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12894-023-01176-y

 received in 2022-10-31, accepted in 2023-01-23,  发布年份 2023

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundTransrectal (TR) ultrasound guided prostate biopsy and transperineal (TP) ultrasound guided prostate biopsy are the two most commonly used methods to detect prostate cancer, the detection rate of the two biopsy approaches may differ in patients with different clinical characteristics. Here we aimed to compare the prostate cancer detection rate and positive rate of biopsy cores between TR and TP prostate biopsy in patients with different clinical characteristics.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed and compared the clinical data of 452 patients underwent TR or TP prostate biopsy in our hospital from June 2017 to September 2021. And patients were stratified according to several clinical characteristic (serum PSA level, prostate volume, PSA density, T stage and ISUP grade), cancer detection rate and positive rate of biopsy cores were compared in different stratified groups.ResultsThere was no significant difference in age, PSA level, prostate volume, and PSA density between the TR and TP groups. TR group had a higher overall cancer detection rate and positive rate of biopsy cores than TP group. Further subgroup analysis showed that TR group had a higher cancer detection rate in patients with prostate volumes 30–80 mL, and that the TR group had a higher positive rate of biopsy cores among the patients with T3–T4 stages, while TP group had a higher positive rates of biopsy cores among the patients with T1–T2 stages. There were no significant differences between the TR and TP groups for each subgroup when stratified by PSA level, PSA density and ISUP grade.ConclusionsTR approach may have advantage in patients with prostate volumes 30–80 mL and T3–T4 stages, while TP approach may have advantage in patients with T1–T2 stages.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 图 表 】

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq641.gif