期刊论文详细信息
Evolution: Education and Outreach
Still a private universe? Community college students’ understanding of evolution
Research
Philip Sadler1  Brian Alters2  Meredith A. Dorner3 
[1]Center for Astrophysics, Harvard & Smithsonian, 60 Garden Street, MS-71, 02138, Cambridge, MA, USA
[2]Chapman University, One University Drive, 92866, Orange, CA, USA
[3]Irvine Valley College, 5500 Irvine Center Drive, 92618, Irvine, CA, USA
关键词: Evolution understanding;    Evolution education;    Community college;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12052-022-00178-y
 received in 2022-09-11, accepted in 2022-12-06,  发布年份 2022
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundMeasuring what students know and retain about evolution is essential to improving our understanding of how students learn evolution. The literature shows that college students appear to have a poor understanding of evolution, answering questions on various instruments correctly only about half of the time. There is little research regarding evolution understanding among community college students and so this study examines if those students who are enrolled in life science classes, who are assessed using questions based on grade eight standards, show a better understanding of evolutionary principles than younger students and if there are differences in knowledge based on course enrollment. The authors utilized a survey of 41 items of the Life Sciences Concept Inventory that were specifically designed to measure knowledge about various aspects of evolution that relate to the 5–8 grade science standards on evolution. They administered it to 191 adult students who were enrolled in nine sections across five life sciences courses at one community college in Southern California.ResultsResults indicated that the students in this study possessed a fair understanding of evolution, averaging scores of nearly 70%, higher than what other researchers have found (using different instruments). Students enrolled in biology major classes scored significantly higher than those enrolled in non/mixed-major courses. There was a strong relationship between item difficulty and discrimination as well as difficulty and misconception strength. When compared with the 5–8 grade student data, the community college students showed a lower level of difficulty and higher levels of item discrimination, but the proportion choosing the most popular wrong answer (the dominant misconception), was comparable. College students showed similar patterns to the grade 5–8 students in terms of which questions and which material were the most challenging, despite performing better overall.ConclusionsIn this study, students possessed fair understanding of evolution. However, they were assessed with an instrument designed for 5th through 8th grade students. The results of this study support the need for more research into how community college students understand evolution and which factors impact that understanding.
【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2022

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202305113446889ZK.pdf 2120KB PDF download
41116_2022_35_Article_IEq386.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 4 363KB Image download
41116_2022_35_Article_IEq396.gif 1KB Image download
41116_2022_35_Article_IEq398.gif 1KB Image download
12888_2022_4443_Article_IEq2.gif 1KB Image download
12888_2022_4443_Article_IEq4.gif 1KB Image download
41116_2022_35_Article_IEq404.gif 1KB Image download
【 图 表 】

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq404.gif

12888_2022_4443_Article_IEq4.gif

12888_2022_4443_Article_IEq2.gif

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq398.gif

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq396.gif

Fig. 4

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq386.gif

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  • [64]
  • [65]
  • [66]
  • [67]
  • [68]
  • [69]
  • [70]
  • [71]
  • [72]
  • [73]
  • [74]
  • [75]
  • [76]
  • [77]
  • [78]
  • [79]
  • [80]
  • [81]
  • [82]
  • [83]
  • [84]
  • [85]
  • [86]
  • [87]
  • [88]
  • [89]
  • [90]
  • [91]
  • [92]
  • [93]
  • [94]
  • [95]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:3次