期刊论文详细信息
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
A complex ePrescribing-based Anti-Microbial Stewardship (ePAMS+) intervention for hospitals combining technological and behavioural components: protocol for a feasibility trial
Study Protocol
Christopher J. Weir1  Holly Ennis1  Imad Adamestam1  Robin Williams2  Sarah Pontefract3  Jamie Coleman3  Ann Slee4  Andrew Heed5  Neil Watson6  Sarah Slight7  Lucy Yardley8  Richard Lilford9  Rona Sharp1,10  Aziz Sheikh1,10  Jillian Beggs1,10  Kathrin Cresswell1,10  Antony Chuter1,10  Omara Dogar1,11  James Mason1,12 
[1] Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK;Institute for the Study of Science, Technology and Innovation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK;Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK;NHS England, London, UK;Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK;Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK;NHS Covid Vaccine North East and North Cumbria, Carlisle, UK;School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK;School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK;School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK;University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK;Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK;Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK;Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK;Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK;
关键词: Health informatics;    Bacteriology;    Infectious diseases;    Microbiology;    Decision support;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s40814-022-01230-w
 received in 2022-05-23, accepted in 2022-12-16,  发布年份 2022
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundAntimicrobial resistance is a leading global public health threat, with inappropriate use of antimicrobials in healthcare contributing to its development. Given this urgent need, we developed a complex ePrescribing-based Anti-Microbial Stewardship intervention (ePAMS+).MethodsePAMS+ includes educational and organisational behavioural elements, plus guideline-based clinical decision support to aid optimal antimicrobial use in hospital inpatients. ePAMS+ particularly focuses on prompt initiation of antimicrobials, followed by early review once test results are available to facilitate informed decision-making on stopping or switching where appropriate. A mixed-methods feasibility trial of ePAMS+ will take place in two NHS acute hospital care organisations. Qualitative staff interviews and observation of practice will respectively gather staff views on the technical component of ePAMS+ and information on their use of ePAMS+ in routine work. Focus groups will elicit staff and patient views on ePAMS+; one-to-one interviews will discuss antimicrobial stewardship with staff and will record patient experiences of receiving antibiotics and their thoughts on inappropriate prescribing. Qualitative data will be analysed thematically. Fidelity Index development will enable enactment of ePAMS+ to be measured objectively in a subsequent trial assessing the effectiveness of ePAMS+. Quantitative data collection will determine the feasibility of extracting data and deriving key summaries of antimicrobial prescribing; we will quantify variability in the primary outcome, number of antibiotic defined daily doses, to inform the future larger-scale trial design.DiscussionThis trial is essential to determine the feasibility of implementing the ePAMS+ intervention and measuring relevant outcomes, prior to evaluating its clinical and cost-effectiveness in a full scale hybrid cluster-randomised stepped-wedge clinical trial. Findings will be shared with study sites and with qualitative research participants and will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at academic conferences.Trial registrationThe qualitative and Fidelity Index research were approved by the Health and Research Authority and the North of Scotland Research Ethics Service (ref: 19/NS/0174). The feasibility trial and quantitative analysis (protocol v1.0, 15 December 2021) were approved by the London South East Research Ethics Committee (ref: 22/LO/0204) and registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN 13429325) on 24 March 2022

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2022

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202305113046014ZK.pdf 1476KB PDF download
40249_2022_1049_Article_IEq52.gif 1KB Image download
MediaObjects/12951_2023_1776_MOESM1_ESM.docx 58576KB Other download
MediaObjects/13046_2023_2611_MOESM6_ESM.pdf 60KB PDF download
Fig. 1 105KB Image download
MediaObjects/13046_2023_2611_MOESM7_ESM.pdf 83KB PDF download
Fig. 6 425KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 6

Fig. 1

40249_2022_1049_Article_IEq52.gif

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:13次 浏览次数:2次