期刊论文详细信息
Frontiers in Zoology
A pilot study to estimate the population size of endangered Galápagos marine iguanas using drones
Methodology
Sebastian Steinfartz1  Amy MacLeod1  Andrea Varela-Jaramillo2  Juan M. Guayasamin3  Gonzalo Rivas-Torres4 
[1] Institute of Biology, Molecular Evolution and Systematics of Animals, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany;Institute of Biology, Molecular Evolution and Systematics of Animals, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany;3Diversity, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador;Laboratorio de Biología Evolutiva, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales COCIBA, Instituto Biósfera, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Calle Diego de Robles s/n y Pampite, Cumbayá, Pichincha, Quito, Ecuador;Galápagos Science Center, GSC, San Cristóbal, Galápagos, Ecuador;Laboratorio de Biología Evolutiva, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales COCIBA, Instituto Biósfera, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Calle Diego de Robles s/n y Pampite, Cumbayá, Pichincha, Quito, Ecuador;Galápagos Science Center, GSC, San Cristóbal, Galápagos, Ecuador;Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA;
关键词: Aerial photography;    Conservation;    Drones;    Monitoring;    Population survey;    Survey methods;    Technology;    UAVs;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12983-022-00478-5
 received in 2022-07-26, accepted in 2022-11-21,  发布年份 2022
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundLarge-scale species monitoring remains a significant conservation challenge. Given the ongoing biodiversity crisis, the need for reliable and efficient methods has never been greater. Drone-based techniques have much to offer in this regard: they allow access to otherwise unreachable areas and enable the rapid collection of non-invasive field data. Herein, we describe the development of a drone-based method for the estimation of population size in Galápagos marine iguanas, Amblyrhynchus cristatus. As a large-bodied lizard that occurs in open coastal terrain, this endemic species is an ideal candidate for drone surveys. Almost all Amblyrhynchus subspecies are Endangered or Critically Endangered according to the IUCN yet since several colonies are inaccessible by foot, ground- based methods are unable to address the critical need for better census data. In order to establish a drone-based approach to estimate population size of marine iguanas, we surveyed in January 2021 four colonies on three focal islands (San Cristobal, Santa Fe and Espanola) using three techniques: simple counts (the standard method currently used by conservation managers), capture mark-resight (CMR), and drone-based counts. The surveys were performed within a 4-day window under similar ambient conditions. We then compared the approaches in terms of feasibility, outcome and effort.ResultsThe highest population-size estimates were obtained using CMR, and drone-based counts were on average 14% closer to CMR estimates—and 17–35% higher—than those obtained by simple counts. In terms of field-time, drone-surveys can be faster than simple counts, but image analyses were highly time consuming.ConclusionThough CMR likely produces superior estimates, it cannot be performed in most cases due to lack of access and knowledge regarding colonies. Drone-based surveys outperformed ground-based simple counts in terms of outcome and this approach is therefore suitable for use across the range of the species. Moreover, the aerial approach is currently the only credible solution for accessing and surveying marine iguanas at highly remote colonies. The application of citizen science and other aids such as machine learning will alleviate the issue regarding time needed to analyze the images.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202305112743507ZK.pdf 2769KB PDF download
41116_2022_35_Article_IEq210.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 1 342KB Image download
Fig. 3 395KB Image download
41116_2022_35_Article_IEq250.gif 1KB Image download
MediaObjects/12888_2022_4483_MOESM2_ESM.docx 19KB Other download
【 图 表 】

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq250.gif

Fig. 3

Fig. 1

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq210.gif

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:7次 浏览次数:1次