期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Biomechanical effects of hybrid constructions in the treatment of noncontinuous cervical spondylopathy: a finite element analysis
Research Article
Wei Tang1  Yunqiang Chen1  Yuqi Liu2  Siyuan Sun3  Yang Zhang4  Shibao Lu5  Jiang Huang5  Qingming Zhang5  Juyong Wang5  Li Cao5  Xiangyao Sun6  Zelong Song7 
[1] Beijing Glitzern Technology Co., Ltd, 100077, Beijing, China;Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100053, Beijing, China;Department of Interdisciplinary, Life Science, Purdue University, 47907, West Lafayette, IN, USA;Department of Orthopaedics, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, 100191, Beijing, China;Department of Orthopaedics, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, 100053, Beijing, China;National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, 100053, Beijing, China;Department of Orthopaedics, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, 100053, Beijing, China;National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, 100053, Beijing, China;Beijing Glitzern Technology Co., Ltd, 100077, Beijing, China;Nankai University School of Medicine, Nankai University, 300071, Tianjin, China;Department of Orthopaedics, The PLA General Hospital, 100000, Beijing, China;
关键词: Hybrid construction;    Total disc replacement;    Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion;    Noncontinuous cervical spondylopathy;    Biomechanics;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s13018-023-03537-7
 received in 2022-07-04, accepted in 2023-01-12,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundHybrid construction (HC) may be an ideal surgical strategy than noncontinuous total disc replacement (TDR) and noncontinuous anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of noncontinuous cervical spondylopathy. However, there is still no consensus on the segmental selection for ACDF or TDR in HC. The study aims to analyse the effects of different segment selection of TDR and ACDF on cervical biomechanical characteristics after HC surgery.MethodsTwelve FEMs of C2–C7 were constructed based on CT images of 12 mild cervical spondylopathy volunteers. Two kinds of HC were introduced in our study: Fusion-arthroplasty group (Group 1), upper-level (C3/4) ACDF, and lower-level TDR (C5/6); Arthroplasty-fusion group (Group 2), upper-level (C3/4) TDR and lower-level ACDF (C5/6). The follow-load technique was simulated by applying an axial initial load of 73.6 N through the motion centre of FEM. A bending moment of 1.0 Nm was applied to the centre of C2 in all FEMs. Statistical analysis was carried out by SPSS 26.0. The significance threshold was 5% (P < 0.05).ResultsIn the comparison of ROMs between Group 1 and Group 2, the ROM in extension (P = 0.016), and lateral bending (P = 0.038) of C4/5 were significantly higher in Group 1 group. The average intervertebral disc pressures at C2/3 in all directions were significantly higher in Group 1 than those in Group 2 (P < 0.005). The average contact forces in facet joints of C2/3 (P = 0.007) were significantly more than that in Group 2; however, the average contact forces in facet joints of C6/7 (P < 0.001) in Group 1 group were significantly less than that in Group 2.ConclusionsArthroplasty-fusion is preferred for intervertebral disc degeneration in adjacent upper segments. Fusion-arthroplasty is preferred for patients with lower intervertebral disc degeneration or lower posterior column degeneration.Trial registration: This research was registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900020513).

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202305110047676ZK.pdf 1294KB PDF download
Fig. 1 1478KB Image download
41116_2022_35_Article_IEq4.gif 1KB Image download
41116_2022_35_Article_IEq7.gif 1KB Image download
41116_2022_35_Article_IEq8.gif 1KB Image download
41116_2022_35_Article_IEq22.gif 1KB Image download
【 图 表 】

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq22.gif

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq8.gif

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq7.gif

41116_2022_35_Article_IEq4.gif

Fig. 1

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:4次 浏览次数:3次