期刊论文详细信息
Large-scale Assessments in Education
Inequality in remote learning quality during COVID-19: student perspectives and mitigating factors
Research
Andrés Strello1  Ana María Mejía-Rodríguez1  Alec I. Kennedy1 
[1] International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA), Überseering 27, 22297, Hamburg, Germany;
关键词: Education during pandemic;    Remote learning;    Digital divide;    Teaching quality;    Student engagement;    Inequality;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s40536-022-00143-7
 received in 2022-09-02, accepted in 2022-11-28,  发布年份 2022
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundRemote learning, or synchronous or asynchronous instruction provided to students outside the classroom, was a common strategy used by schools to ensure learning continuity for their students when many school buildings were forced to shut down due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Differences in technology infrastructures, digital competencies of students and teachers, and home supports for learning likely led to inequalities in the way remote learning reached and was perceived by students. This study seeks to understand how student perspectives on remote learning varied across and within several countries.MethodsBuilding off a conceptual framework developed to understand remote learning success and using data from the Responses to Education Disruption Survey (REDS) student questionnaire from seven countries, we construct measures of student perceptions of three essential components of successful remote learning: Access to Suitable Technology, Effective Teachers, and Engaged Students. We then compare values on these scales across and within countries to identify inequalities in remote learning quality during school closures. We also investigate the extent to which schools implemented supports for remote learning across countries.ResultsWe find evidence of across country variation in remote learning quality with certain countries having much lower values on our remote learning quality scales compared to other countries in our sample. Furthermore, we identify within-country inequalities in access to and confidence in using technology with low-SES students, girls, and those living in rural areas having lower values on these measures. Furthermore, we find some evidence of within-country inequalities in student engagement across socioeconomic groups. In contrast, we do not find as many inequalities in our measures of effective teachers. In most countries, schools provided several supports to improve remote learning.ConclusionsWhile inequalities in remote learning experiences were anticipated and confirmed by our results, we find it promising that, in some countries, inequalities in access to and confidence in using technology as well as student engagement did not extend to inequalities in perceptions of teacher effectiveness and support. Schools’ efforts to support remote learning, regardless of student background, should be seen as a positive and illustrate their resilience in the face of many challenges.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2022

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202305068676132ZK.pdf 1469KB PDF download
MediaObjects/13046_2020_1633_MOESM8_ESM.tif 3869KB Other download
MediaObjects/12888_2022_4400_MOESM1_ESM.pdf 47KB PDF download
Fig. 2 995KB Image download
Fig. 6 395KB Image download
Fig. 1 149KB Image download
12864_2022_9026_Article_IEq246.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 2 612KB Image download
Fig. 2 1330KB Image download
Fig. 3 535KB Image download
Fig. 3 133KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 3

Fig. 3

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

12864_2022_9026_Article_IEq246.gif

Fig. 1

Fig. 6

Fig. 2

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:7次 浏览次数:4次