Actual timing versus GPs’ perceptions of optimal timing of advance care planning: a mixed-methods health record-based study

BMC Primary Care

Research

Henk Schers¹  Reinier Akkermans²  Mattijs E. Numans³  Petra G. van Peet³  Willemijn Tros³  Jenny T. van der Steen⁴  Janine Liefers⁵  A. Stef Groenewoud⁵ 

[1] Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands;Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands;Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands;Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands;Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands;Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands;Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands;

关键词: Advance care planning;    Cancer;    Organ failure;    Multimorbidity;    General practice;    Electronic health record;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12875-022-01940-3

 received in 2022-09-19, accepted in 2022-12-05,  发布年份 2022

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundTimely initiation of advance care planning (ACP) in general practice is challenging, especially in patients with non-malignant conditions. Our aim was to investigate how perceived optimal timing of ACP initiation and its triggers relate to recorded actual timing in patients with cancer, organ failure, or multimorbidity.MethodsIn this mixed-methods study in the Netherlands, we analysed health records selected from a database with primary care routine data and with a recorded ACP conversation in the last two years before death of patients who died with cancer, organ failure, or multimorbidity. We compared actual timing of ACP initiation as recorded in health records of 51 patients with the perceived optimal timing as determined by 83 independent GPs who studied these records. Further, to identify and compare triggers for GPs to initiate ACP, we analysed the health record documentation around the moments of the recorded actual timing of ACP initiation and the perceived optimal timing of ACP initiation. We combined quantitative descriptive statistics with qualitative content analysis.ResultsThe recorded actual timing of ACP initiation was significantly closer to death than the perceived optimal timing in patients with cancer (median 88 vs. 111 days before death (p = 0.049)), organ failure (227 vs. 306 days before death (p = 0.02)) and multimorbidity (113 vs. 338 days before death (p = 0.006)). Triggers for recorded actual versus perceived optimal timing were similar across the three groups, the most frequent being ‘expressions of patients’ reflections or wishes’ (14% and 14% respectively) and ‘appropriate setting’ (10% and 13% respectively).ConclusionACP in general practice was initiated and recorded later in the illness trajectory than considered optimal, especially in patients with organ failure or multimorbidity. As triggers were similar for recorded actual and perceived optimal timing, we recommend that GPs initiate ACP shortly after a trigger is noticed the first time, rather than wait for additional or more evident triggers when the illness is in an advanced stage.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2022

【 图 表 】

12982_2022_119_Article_IEq187.gif

Fig. 1

12982_2022_119_Article_IEq47.gif

12982_2022_119_Article_IEq42.gif