Evidence-based family planning services among publicly funded providers in Texas

BMC Health Services Research

Research

Elizabeth Ela¹  Kristine Hopkins¹  Elsa Vizcarra¹  Joseph E. Potter¹  Liana J. Petruzzi²  Shetal Vohra-Gupta²  Kari White³ 

[1] Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, 305 E. 23Rd Street, 78712, Austin, TX, USA;Texas Policy Evaluation Project, The University of Texas at Austin, 116 Inner Campus Dr., 78712, Austin, TX, USA;Steve Hicks School of Social Work, The University of Texas at Austin, 1925 San Jacinto Blvd, 78712, Austin, TX, USA;Steve Hicks School of Social Work, The University of Texas at Austin, 1925 San Jacinto Blvd, 78712, Austin, TX, USA;Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, 305 E. 23Rd Street, 78712, Austin, TX, USA;Texas Policy Evaluation Project, The University of Texas at Austin, 116 Inner Campus Dr., 78712, Austin, TX, USA;

关键词: Health policy;    Women’s health;    Reproductive health services;    Family planning;    Contraception;    Health surveys;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12913-022-08889-0

 received in 2022-06-14, accepted in 2022-11-25,  发布年份 2022

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundHealthy Texas Women (HTW) is a fee-for-service family planning program that excludes affiliates of abortion providers. The HTW network includes providers who participate in Title X or the state Family Planning Program (FPP) and primary care providers without additional family planning funding (HTW-only). The objective of this study is to compare client volume and use of evidence-based practices among HTW providers.MethodsClient volume was determined from administrative data on unduplicated HTW clients served in fiscal year (FY) 2017. A sample of 114 HTW providers, stratified by region, completed a 2018 survey about contraceptive methods offered, adherence to evidence-based contraceptive provision, barriers to offering IUDs and implants, and counseling/referrals for pregnant patients. Differences by funding source were assessed using t-tests and chi-square tests.ResultsAlthough HTW-only providers served 58% of HTW clients, most (72%) saw < 50 clients in FY2017. Only 5% of HTW providers received Title X or FPP funding, but 46% served ≥ 500 HTW clients. HTW-only providers were less likely than Title X providers to offer hormonal IUDs (70% vs. 92%) and implants (66% vs 96%); offer same-day placement of IUDs (21% vs 79%) and implants (21% vs 83%); and allow patients to delay cervical cancer screening when initiating contraception (58% vs 83%; all p < 0.05). There were few provider-level differences in counseling/referrals for unplanned pregnancy (p > 0.05).ConclusionsHTW-only providers served fewer clients and were less likely to follow evidence-based practices. Program modifications that strengthen the provider network and quality of care are needed to support family planning services for low-income Texans.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2022

【 图 表 】

40517_2022_243_Article_IEq20.gif