期刊论文详细信息
BMC Oral Health
Removal capability, implant-abutment connection damage and thermal effect using ultrasonic and drilling techniques for the extraction of fractured abutment screws: an in vitro study
Research
Javier Borrajo Sánchez1  Jorge Hernández Rodríguez1  Elena Riad Deglow2  Sofía Hernández Montero2  María Bufalá Pérez2  Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho3  Jorge Alonso Pérez-Barquero4 
[1] Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain;Department of Implant Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alfonso X El Sabio University, Avda. Universidad, 1., 28691, Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain;Department of Implant Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alfonso X El Sabio University, Avda. Universidad, 1., 28691, Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain;Department of Surgery, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain;Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, 46010, Valencia, Spain;
关键词: Dental implants;    Fractured;    Screw-retained;    Abutment screw;    Dental prostheses;    Implant-supported protheses;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12903-022-02653-w
 received in 2022-09-21, accepted in 2022-12-07,  发布年份 2022
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The aim of this work was to analyze and compare the removal capability, conical internal hex implant-abutment connection damage and thermal effect using ultrasonic and drilling techniques for the extraction of fractured abutment screws. Twenty abutment screws were randomly fractured into twenty dental implants and randomly extracted using the following removal techniques: Group A: drilling technique without irrigation (n = 10) (DT) and Group B: ultrasonic technique without irrigation (n = 10) (UT). The dental implants were submitted to a preoperative and postoperative micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scan to obtain a Standard Tessellation Language (STL) digital file that determined the wear comparison by morphometry. Moreover, the thermographic effects generated by the DT and UT removal techniques were registered using a thermographic digital camera. Comparative analysis was performed by comparing the volumetric differences (mm3) between preoperative and postoperative micro-CT scans and thermographic results (°C) using the Student t test. The DT extracted 8/10 and the US 9/10 abutment screws. The pairwise comparison revealed statistically significant differences between the volumetric differences of postoperative and preoperative micro-CT scans of the DT (− 0.09 ± − 0.02mm3) and UT (− 0.93 ± − 0.32mm3) study groups (p = 0.0042); in addition, the pairwise comparison revealed statistically significant differences between the thermographic values of the DT (38.12 ± − 10.82 °C) and UT (78.52 ± 5.43 °C) study groups (p < 0.001). The drilling technique without irrigation provides a less removal capability, less conical internal hex implant-abutment connection damage and less thermal effect than ultrasonic technique for the extraction of fractured abutment screws; however, the ultrasonic technique resulted more effective for the extraction of fractured abutment screws.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2022

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202305065598525ZK.pdf 1314KB PDF download
Fig. 2 136KB Image download
12982_2022_119_Article_IEq196.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 1 935KB Image download
Fig. 4 268KB Image download
12982_2022_119_Article_IEq90.gif 1KB Image download
12982_2022_119_Article_IEq94.gif 1KB Image download
12888_2022_4365_Article_IEq11.gif 1KB Image download
【 图 表 】

12888_2022_4365_Article_IEq11.gif

12982_2022_119_Article_IEq94.gif

12982_2022_119_Article_IEq90.gif

Fig. 4

Fig. 1

12982_2022_119_Article_IEq196.gif

Fig. 2

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:3次 浏览次数:0次