期刊论文详细信息
Urban Rail Transit
Influence of Structural Types of CRTS I Plate-Type Ballastless Track on Aerodynamic Characteristics of High-Speed Train
Original Research Papers
Chenjie Bian1  Liming Du2  Peng Zhang2 
[1] School of Civil Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, 116028, Dalian, Liaoning, China;School of Locomotive and Rolling Stock Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, 116028, Dalian, Liaoning, China;
关键词: High-speed train;    Ballastless track;    Aerodynamic performance;    Flow field characteristics;   
DOI  :  10.1007/s40864-022-00173-y
 received in 2022-06-14, accepted in 2022-08-08,  发布年份 2022
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

In order to improve the running quality of trains on a ballastless track, the influence of the CRTS I ballastless track with different structures (flat-type and frame-type tracks) is investigated with respect to the aerodynamic characteristics of high-speed trains. In the present paper, the aerodynamic force changes on the head, middle, tail, and whole car of the high-speed train were studied under two conditions, with crosswind and without crosswind, and the influence of different crosswind speeds (10, 15, 20, 25, 30 m/s) on the aerodynamic force of the train was analyzed. The pressure and flow field distribution characteristics were also studied, and the reasons for the different aerodynamic characteristics of different track structures and trains running in different wind environments were analyzed, respectively. The results indicate that the ballastless track structure obviously influences the aerodynamic characteristics of the high-speed train. When there is no natural wind, compared with the flat track, the frame track reduces the drag and lateral forces of the train but increases the lift force. The frame track causes the drag force of the whole vehicle to decrease slightly (the maximum ratio is 2.15%), the lift force increases significantly (the maximum ratio is 12.55%), and the lateral force obviously decreases (the maximum ratio is 52.43%). The lift and lateral forces of the middle car are most affected, which is because the frame structure changes the vortex motion state of the middle car. Compared with the flat track, the drag force of each car on the frame track is reduced under the crosswind; the lift force of each car is increased, and the maximum increase in the lift force of the head, middle, and tail cars is 5.60%, 2.55%, and 3.63%, respectively; the lateral force of the tail car increases greatly at a wind speed of 15 m/s, reaching 6.84%. Due to the existence of the frame structure, the space under the vehicle increases, resulting in a decrease in the airflow rate and an increase in local pressure, which leads to changes in the train’s aerodynamic force. Meanwhile, the train’s aerodynamic change under the crosswind is smaller than that when there is no wind.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2022

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202305065522359ZK.pdf 6889KB PDF download
41408_2022_764_Article_IEq30.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 1 134KB Image download
12864_2022_9026_Article_IEq57.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 6 963KB Image download
Fig. 2 751KB Image download
Fig. 1 2451KB Image download
Fig. 1 187KB Image download
Fig. 1 536KB Image download
Fig. 2 1566KB Image download
Fig. 1 477KB Image download
MediaObjects/13046_2022_2563_MOESM7_ESM.xlsx 9KB Other download
Fig. 1 174KB Image download
Fig. 1 557KB Image download
Fig. 2 2492KB Image download
Fig. 1 879KB Image download
MediaObjects/12951_2022_1742_MOESM1_ESM.docx 891KB Other download
MediaObjects/41408_2022_759_MOESM10_ESM.txt 57KB Other download
Fig. 2 1229KB Image download
MediaObjects/12888_2022_4488_MOESM1_ESM.docx 218KB Other download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 6

12864_2022_9026_Article_IEq57.gif

Fig. 1

41408_2022_764_Article_IEq30.gif

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:4次 浏览次数:2次