Needle consideration in umbilical two-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for patent processus vaginalis of children: hook-needle or forcep-needle

BMC Surgery

Research

Jing Zhang¹  Yuanhong Xiao² 

[1] Department of Pediatric Surgery, Beijing United Family Hospital and Clinics, 2 Jiangtai Road, Chaoyang District, 100015, Beijing, China;Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Seventh Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Nan Men Cang Hutong 5th, Dong Si Shi Tiao, Dong Cheng District, 100700, Beijing, China;

关键词: Boys;    Child;    Laparoscopy;    Minimal invasive surgery;    Patent processus vaginalis closure;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12893-022-01866-8

 received in 2022-08-10, accepted in 2022-11-24,  发布年份 2022

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundAlthough umbilical two-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for the treatment of processus vaginalis patency of children has been verified to be safe and effective, the improvements of technical skills and instruments have been always on their ways. Recently, forcep-needle has begun to be used. In this study, we compared forcep-needle with hook-needle in this minimal invasive procedure for children suffered from hernia or hydrocele, with the aim to evaluate the instrumental convenience of the two needles.MethodsFrom July 2021 to May 2022, we begun to use hook-needle or forcep-needle in umbilical two-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for children suffered from hernia or hydrocele. The hook-needle group included nineteen children and the forcep-needle group included twenty-four ones. The data of the patients age, sex, side, operation time, postoperative hospital-stay, follow-up time, postoperative complications were evaluated. Common silk thread was used to encircle the internal ring preperitoneally.ResultsThere were no statistical differences between the two groups for the following items: age, sex, side, operation time, postoperative hospital-stay and postoperative complications (P > 0.05). The follow-up time of the hook-needle group was longer than that of the forcep-one (P = 0.0020). No open transfer happened for all the patients. One hydrocele boy in the hook-needle group reoccurred 1 month postoperatively due to the peritoneal broken. The single pole retreating of the hook-needle accompanied with chaotic movements, while for that of the forcep-needle, the double-arm retreating movements were more orderly. The outer surface of the forcep-needle was smooth without restrain, as for the hook-needle, an inlaid barb held the danger of brokening the peritoneum.ConclusionIn our preliminary experience of umbilical two-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure using a hook-needle or a forcep-needle, in view of the instrumental convenience and safety, the double-arm and smooth outer surface designs of the forcep-needle contained more spatial orientation perceptions and safety.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2022

【 图 表 】

12982_2022_119_Article_IEq132.gif

Fig. 1

12888_2022_4365_Article_IEq41.gif