Effect of different surface treatments on resin-matrix CAD/CAM ceramics bonding to dentin: in vitro study

BMC Oral Health

Research

Hanan Fathy¹  Salah H. Mahmoud¹  Hamdi H. Hamama¹  Noha El-Wassefy² 

[1] Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, 35516, Mansoura, Egypt;Dental Biomaterials Science Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt;

关键词: CAD/CAM;    Hybrid ceramics;    Indirect restorations;    Inlays;    Micro-tensile bond strength;    Nano-ceramics;    Polymer-infiltrated ceramics;    Resin-based composites;    Resin-matrix ceramics;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12903-022-02674-5

 received in 2022-08-31, accepted in 2022-12-16,  发布年份 2022

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundEvaluating the effect of different surface treatment methods on the micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) of two different resin-matrix computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramics (RMCs).MethodsA standardized inlay preparations were performed on 100 intact maxillary premolars. According to the type of the restorative material, the teeth were randomly divided into two equally sized groups (n = 50): (polymer-infiltrated ceramic (Vita Enamic) and resin-based composites (Lava Ultimate)). The inlays were fabricated using CAD/CAM technology. In each group, the specimens were randomly assigned to five subgroups (n = 10) according to the surface treatment method: group 1 used was the control group (no surface treatment); group 2, was treated with air abrasion with 50 μm Al2O3 (A) and universal adhesive (UA); group 3, was treated with air abrasion with 50 μm Al2O3 (A) and silane coupling agent (S); group 4, was treated with hydrofluoric acid (HF) and universal adhesive (UA) and group 5, was treated with Hydrofluoric acid (HF) + silane coupling agent (S). The inlays were then cemented to their respective preparations using dual-cure self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200, 3 M ESPE) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The µTBS test was conducted in all groups, and stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope were used to inspect the failure mode. The data were statistically analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post-hoc multiple comparison tests at a significance level of p < 0.05.ResultsSurface treatments significantly increased the µTBS of the materials compared to the control group (p < 0.05). For CAD/CAM RBCs, the µTBS value highest in group 2 whereas, for PICN, the µTBS value was highest in group 3. Cohesive failure of CAD/CAM restorative material was the most predominant mode of failure in all treated groups, whereas adhesive failure at restoration-cement interface was the most predominant failure mode in the control group.ConclusionSurface treatments increase the µTBS of resin-matrix CAD/CAM ceramics to tooth structure. Air abrasion followed by universal adhesive and hydrofluoric acid followed by silane application appears to be the best strategies for optimizing the bond strength of CAD/CAM RBCs and PICN respectively.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2022

【 图 表 】

Fig. 3

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 4

Fig. 2

Fig. 4

Fig. 1