期刊论文详细信息
npj Digital Medicine
An interpretable artificial intelligence system for detecting risk factors of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding
Article
Mingkai Chen1  Liwen Yao1  Chenxia Zhang1  Ming Xu1  Zhengqiang Wang1  Xiaoda Jiang1  Jing Wang1  Yong Xiao1  Yijie Zhu1  Mengjuan Lin1  Xun Li1  Honggang Yu1  Renquan Luo1  Lianlian Wu1  Jiao Li1  Shi Chen2 
[1] Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China;Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China;Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China;Department of Gastroenterology, Wuhan Puren Hospital, Wuhan, China;
DOI  :  10.1038/s41746-022-00729-z
 received in 2022-06-04, accepted in 2022-11-29,  发布年份 2022
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Bleeding risk factors for gastroesophageal varices (GEV) detected by endoscopy in cirrhotic patients determine the prophylactical treatment patients will undergo in the following 2 years. We propose a methodology for measuring the risk factors. We create an artificial intelligence system (ENDOANGEL-GEV) containing six models to segment GEV and to classify the grades (grades 1–3) and red color signs (RC, RC0-RC3) of varices. It also summarizes changes in the above results with region in real time. ENDOANGEL-GEV is trained using 6034 images from 1156 cirrhotic patients across three hospitals (dataset 1) and validated on multicenter datasets with 11009 images from 141 videos (dataset 2) and in a prospective study recruiting 161 cirrhotic patients from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University (dataset 3). In dataset 1, ENDOANGEL-GEV achieves intersection over union values of 0.8087 for segmenting esophageal varices and 0.8141 for gastric varices. In dataset 2, the system maintains fairly accuracy across images from three hospitals. In dataset 3, ENDOANGEL-GEV surpasses attended endoscopists in detecting RC of GEV and classifying grades (p < 0.001). When ranking the risk of patients combined with the Child‒Pugh score, ENDOANGEL-GEV outperforms endoscopists for esophageal varices (p < 0.001) and shows comparable performance for gastric varices (p = 0.152). Compared with endoscopists, ENDOANGEL-GEV may help 12.31% (16/130) more patients receive the right intervention. We establish an interpretable system for the endoscopic diagnosis and risk stratification of GEV. It will assist in detecting the first bleeding risk factors accurately and expanding the scope of quantitative measurement of diseases.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2022

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202305061785825ZK.pdf 1113KB PDF download
Fig. 4 141KB Image download
Fig. 2 239KB Image download
Fig. 2 856KB Image download
Fig. 4 1474KB Image download
Fig. 1 464KB Image download
Fig. 2 462KB Image download
Fig. 2 547KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 4

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 4

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:30次 浏览次数:1次