Accessing needle exchange services in disasters for remote areas of Aotearoa New Zealand

Harm Reduction Journal

Research

Chris Brough¹  Denise Blake²  Anne Rijnink³  Shiloh Groot⁴ 

[1]NICHE, Nelson, Aotearoa New Zealand

[2]School of Health, Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, Aotearoa New Zealand

[3]School of Psychology, Massey University, Wellington, Aotearoa New Zealand

[4]School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand

关键词: PWID;    Health care;    Access;    Rural regions;    Disasters;    Preparedness;    Qualitative research;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12954-022-00709-2

 received in 2022-04-25, accepted in 2022-10-21,  发布年份 2022

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundNeedle Exchange Programme (NEP) mobile outreach services in Aotearoa New Zealand distribute injecting equipment to people who inject drugs (PWID) living in remote regions. In disasters, continued access to such services is imperative for the health and wellbeing of PWID. Disasters can compound existing inequities, particularly in regions characterised by poor or limited infrastructure, smaller populations, and challenging socioeconomic conditions. To gain insight into the barriers that prevent access to NEP harm-reduction services and understand the needs of PWID prior to and during disasters, this study foregrounds the voices of PWID based on the West Coast of the South Island, Aotearoa New Zealand.MethodsThis qualitative study applied an interpretive phenomenological analysis approach, where 14 PWID and one key NEP staff member took part in semi-structured interviews. The interviews provided the opportunity for participants to share their experiences and perspectives about accessing sterile drug-injecting equipment during disasters, including the four-week COVID-19 Level 4 lockdown in March 2020. In total five superordinate and 14 subordinate themes were identified from the interveiws.ResultsThis study focuses on four of the key themes that impacted accessibility to NEP services: infrastructural hazards and equipment costs; social capital and practical support from peers and key contact networks; social stigma in public locations, including NEP-based pharmacies and emergency centres; and potential solutions to NEP equipment accessibility as frequently suggested by participants.ConclusionsAccess to NEP services is essential during natural hazard and human-generated disasters, as such NEP mobile outreach services and disaster resilience efforts should focus on maintaining service continuity for PWID during adverse times. This study champions a needs-based, stigma free approach to inclusive harm-reduction and emergency management practices for groups with specific needs in a disaster context.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2022