Prescribed fire in longleaf pine ecosystems: fire managers’ perspectives on priorities, constraints, and future prospects

Fire Ecology

卷:18

Original Research

John A. Kupfer¹  Kirstin Dow¹  Kirsten Lackstrom¹  John M. Grego²  Adam J. Terando³  J. Kevin Hiers⁴ 

[1] Department of Geography, University of South Carolina, 709 Bull Street, 29208, Columbia, SC, USA;

[2] Department of Statistics, University of South Carolina, 29208, Columbia, SC, USA;

[3] US Geological Survey, Southeast Climate Adaptation Science Center, 27695, Raleigh, NC, USA;Department of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, 27695, Raleigh, NC, USA;

[4] Wildland Fire Science, Tall Timbers Research Station, 32312, Tallahassee, FL, USA;US Geological Survey, 20192, Reston, VA, USA;

关键词: Longleaf pine;    Prescribed fire;    Compound stressors;    Burn windows;    Conservation goals;    Climate change;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s42408-022-00151-6

 received in 2022-01-19, accepted in 2022-10-12,  发布年份 2022

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundProjected trajectories of climate and land use change over the remainder of the twenty-first century may result in conditions and situations that require flexible approaches to conservation planning and practices. For example, prescribed burning is a widely used management tool for promoting longer-term resilience and sustainability in longleaf pine ecosystems of the southeastern United States, but regional stressors such as climatic warming, changing fire conditions, and an expanding wildland-urban interface may challenge its application. To facilitate the development of fire management strategies that account for such changes, we surveyed nearly 300 fire managers to elicit information on the criteria used for prioritizing burn sites, current burning practices and constraints, and expectations for changes in burning opportunities, including those pertaining to climate change and urban growth.ResultsRespondents noted that their most common criteria for selecting longleaf pine stands for burning were fire history, ecosystem health, and fuel reduction, with the presence of threatened and endangered species also given priority by public land managers. Many respondents (38%) cited recent burn frequencies that fall short of historic burn intervals. Barriers to burning included legal, institutional, and managerial constraints, such as proximity to human developments, public concerns, and risk aversion, as well as environmental and resource constraints, including weather, air quality restrictions, and lack of personnel, equipment, or funding. Roughly half of all respondents expect that opportunities to burn will be reduced over the next 30 years, particularly during the growing season. Fire manager perceptions of factors that will limit prescribed burning in the future include a similar suite of constraints, many of which will be affected by projected regional changes in land use and climate.ConclusionsOn an organizational level, burn window availability and resource limitations constrain prescribed burning practices. More broadly, policy and legal frameworks coupled with trends in urbanization and climate change are expected to interact with operational constraints to challenge managers’ abilities to implement landscape-scale burning strategies and achieve restoration goals. Additional research and engagement with fire managers are needed to investigate opportunities for introducing policy flexibility, leveraging shared management interests, and developing creative solutions to expand burning opportunities.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2022

【 图 表 】

40507_2023_167_Article_IEq104.gif

Fig. 4

Fig. 1

Fig.4

40507_2023_167_Article_IEq90.gif

13287_2023_3318_Article_IEq15.gif