期刊论文详细信息
Microbiome
Interactions between rootstocks and compost influence the active rhizosphere bacterial communities in citrus
Research
Ute Albrecht1  Sarah L. Strauss2  Antonio Castellano-Hinojosa2 
[1]Department of Horticultural Sciences, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 2685 State Rd 29N, 34142, Immokalee, FL, USA
[2]Department of Soil, Water, and Ecosystem Sciences, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 2685 State Rd 29N, 34142, Immokalee, FL, USA
关键词: Active rhizobiome;    Rhizosphere;    Tree crops;    RNA;    Citrus;    Rootstock selection;    Bacterial recruitment;    Multinutrient cycling;    Predicted functions;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s40168-023-01524-y
 received in 2022-06-26, accepted in 2023-03-20,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundWhile the rootstock genotype (belowground part of a plant) can impact rhizosphere microbial communities, few studies have examined the relationships between rootstock genotype-based recruitment of active rhizosphere bacterial communities and the availability of root nutrients for plant uptake. Rootstocks are developed to provide resistance to disease or tolerance of abiotic stresses, and compost application is a common practice to also control biotic and abiotic stresses in crops. In this field study, we examined: (i) the effect of four citrus rootstocks and/or compost application on the abundance, diversity, composition, and predicted functionality of active rhizosphere bacterial communities, and (ii) the relationships between active rhizosphere bacterial communities and root nutrient concentrations, with identification of bacterial taxa significantly correlated with changes in root nutrients in the rhizosphere.ResultsThe rootstock genotype determined differences in the diversity of active rhizosphere bacterial communities and also impacted how compost altered the abundance, diversity, composition, and predicted functions of these active communities. Variations in the active bacterial rhizobiome were strongly linked to root nutrient cycling, and these interactions were root-nutrient- and rootstock-specific. Direct positive relationships between enriched taxa in treated soils and specific root nutrients were detected, and potentially important taxa for root nutrient uptake were identified. Significant differences in specific predicted functions were related to soil nutrient cycling (carbon, nitrogen, and tryptophan metabolisms) in the active bacterial rhizobiome among rootstocks, particularly in soils treated with compost.ConclusionsThis study illustrates that interactions between citrus rootstocks and compost can influence active rhizosphere bacterial communities, which impact root nutrient concentrations. In particular, the response of the rhizobiome bacterial abundance, diversity, and community composition to compost was determined by the rootstock. Specific bacterial taxa therefore appear to be driving changes in root nutrient concentrations in the active rhizobiome of different citrus rootstocks. Several potential functions of active bacterial rhizobiomes recruited by different citrus rootstocks did not appear to be redundant but rather rootstock-specific. Together, these findings have important agronomic implications as they indicate the potential for agricultural production systems to maximize benefits from rhizobiomes through the choice of selected rootstocks and the application of compost.6QRnEBPSbTfGkWz6eGytjbVideo Abstract
【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202304221390926ZK.pdf 4389KB PDF download
40507_2023_167_Article_IEq159.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 13 136KB Image download
Fig. 5 1203KB Image download
Fig. 2 437KB Image download
40507_2023_167_Article_IEq177.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 1 934KB Image download
Fig. 4 409KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 4

Fig. 1

40507_2023_167_Article_IEq177.gif

Fig. 2

Fig. 5

Fig. 13

40507_2023_167_Article_IEq159.gif

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  • [64]
  • [65]
  • [66]
  • [67]
  • [68]
  • [69]
  • [70]
  • [71]
  • [72]
  • [73]
  • [74]
  • [75]
  • [76]
  • [77]
  • [78]
  • [79]
  • [80]
  • [81]
  • [82]
  • [83]
  • [84]
  • [85]
  • [86]
  • [87]
  • [88]
  • [89]
  • [90]
  • [91]
  • [92]
  • [93]
  • [94]
  • [95]
  • [96]
  • [97]
  • [98]
  • [99]
  • [100]
  • [101]
  • [102]
  • [103]
  • [104]
  • [105]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次