期刊论文详细信息
eJHaem
Blood-circulating EV-miRNAs, serum TARC, and quantitative FDG-PET features in classical Hodgkin lymphoma
article
Esther E. E. Drees1  Julia Driessen2  Gerben J. C. Zwezerijnen2  Sandra A. W. M. Verkuijlen1  Jakoba J. Eertink2  Monique A. J. van Eijndhoven1  Nils J. Groenewegen1  Andrea Vallés-Martí1  Daphne de Jong1  Ronald Boellaard2  Henrica C. W. de Vet2  Dirk M. Pegtel1  Josée M. Zijlstra1 
[1]Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Pathology
[2]Cancer Center Amsterdam
[3]Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Hematology, LYMMCARE ,(Lymphoma and Myeloma Center)
[4]Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
[5]Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Hematology
[6]Exbiome B.V.
[7]Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health research institute
关键词: extracellular vesicles;    FDG-PET;    Hodgkin lymphoma;    miRNAs;    Radiomics;    TARC;   
DOI  :  10.1002/jha2.432
来源: Wiley
PDF
【 摘 要 】
Blood-based biomarkers are gaining interest for response evaluation in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). However, it is unknown how blood-based biomarkers relate to quantitative 18 F-FDG-PET features. We correlated extracellular vesicle-associated miRNAs (EV-miRNA), serum TARC, and complete blood count (CBC) with PET features (e.g., metabolic tumor volume [MTV], dissemination and intensity features) in 30 cHL patients at baseline. EV-miR127-3p, EV-miR24-3p, sTARC, and several CBC parameters showed weak to strong correlations with MTV and dissemination features, but not with intensity features. Two other EV-miRNAs only showed weak correlations with PET features. Therefore, blood-based biomarkers may be complementary to PET features, which warrants further exploration of combining these biomarkers in prognostic models.
【 授权许可】

Unknown   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202302050005844ZK.pdf 1218KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:1次