Safety practices for in-office laryngology procedures during clinical reintroduction amidst COVID-19

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

article

Haley Calcagno MD¹  Benjamin P. Anthony MD¹  Stacey L. Halum MD¹  Noah P. Parker MD¹ 

[1] The Indiana University School of Medicine and the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University;The Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University

关键词: coronavirus;    COVID-19;    laryngoscopy;    otolaryngology;    personal protective equipment;   

DOI  :  10.1002/lio2.591

学科分类：环境科学（综合）

来源: Wiley

【 摘 要 】

Objective Describe safety practices for performing in-office laryngology procedures during clinical re-introduction amidst the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods An anonymous survey in Qualtrics was created to evaluate demographics, preprocedure testing, practice settings, anesthesia, and personal protective equipment (PPE) use for five procedure categories (non-mucosal-traversing injections, mucosal-traversing injections, endoscopy without suction, endoscopy with suction/mucosal intervention via working channel, and laser via working channel). The survey was emailed to the Fall Voice Community on Doc Matter and to members of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association (ABEA) from May to June 2020. Results Eighty-two respondents were analyzed (response rate: 10%). Respondents represented diverse locations, including international. Most reported academic (71%) or private practices (16%), laryngology fellowship training (76%), and a significant practice devotion to laryngology and broncho-esophagology. During the early re-introduction, most continued to perform all procedure categories. The office was preferred to the OR setting for most, though 36% preferred the OR for laser procedures. There was a preference for preprocedural SARS-Cov2 testing for procedures involving a working channel (>67%), and these procedures had the highest proportion of respondents discontinuing the procedure due to COVID-19. Various types of topical anesthesia were reported, including nebulizer treatments. The most common forms of personal protective equipment utilized were gloves (>95%) and N95 masks (>67%). Powered-air purifying respirators and general surgical masks were used infrequently. Conclusions During the early re-introduction, respondents reported generally continuing to perform office laryngology procedures, while greater mucosal manipulation affected decisions to stop procedures due to COVID-19, perform preprocedural SARS-Cov2 testing, and alter topical anesthesia. Gloves and N95 masks were the predominate PPE. Level of Evidence N/A.

【 授权许可】

CC BY|CC BY-NC-ND