Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology | |
Determining treatment choices after the cochlear implant evaluation process | |
article | |
Andrew J. Redmann MD1  Kareem Tawfik MD3  Theresa Hammer AuD4  Lisa Wenstrup AuD4  Shawn Stevens MD5  Joseph T. Breen MD6  Ravi N. Samy MD, FACS6  | |
[1] Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Minnesota;Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology;Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University;Division of Audiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati;Barrows Neurosurgical Clinic;Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati | |
关键词: cochlear implants; evaluation process; treatment pathways; | |
DOI : 10.1002/lio2.546 | |
学科分类:环境科学(综合) | |
来源: Wiley | |
【 摘 要 】
Objectives• Determine the proportion of patients starting the cochlear implant evaluation(CIE) process proceeding to cochlear implantation.• Determine which patient factors are associated with undergoing cochlear implantationMethods: Retrospective case series of all patients scheduled for a CIE within a tertiary academic neurotology practice between January 1, 2014 and April 30, 2016.Management pathways of patients undergoing CIE were examined.Results: Two hundred thirty-seven adult patients were scheduled for CIE during the studyperiod. Two hundred twenty-six patients started the evaluation process, and 203 patientscompleted full evaluation. Of patients that completed CIE, 166/203 (82%) met criteria forimplantation and 37/203 (18%) did not meet criteria. Fifty-nine patients out of 166 patients(36%) meeting criteria did not receive implants and 107/166 (64%) underwent implantation,yielding an overall implantation rate of 47% (107/226) among patients scheduled for CIE.Common reasons for deferring CI among candidates included failure to show up for preoperative appointment (24%), choosing hearing aids as an alternative (22%), patient refusal(21%) and insurance issues (17%). Overall, CIE led to a new adjunctive hearing device (CI orhearing aid) in 113 (113/203, 56%) cases.Conclusion: Fifty-six (113/203) percent of patients who underwent CIE at an academic medical center underwent CI surgery or received an adjunctive hearing device,but 36% (59/166) of candidates did not receive a CI. Patients who forewent CIdespite meeting candidacy criteria did so due to cost/insurance issues, or due to preference for auditory amplification rather than CI.
【 授权许可】
CC BY|CC BY-NC-ND
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO202302050004053ZK.pdf | 492KB | download |