期刊论文详细信息
Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Determining treatment choices after the cochlear implant evaluation process
article
Andrew J. Redmann MD1  Kareem Tawfik MD3  Theresa Hammer AuD4  Lisa Wenstrup AuD4  Shawn Stevens MD5  Joseph T. Breen MD6  Ravi N. Samy MD, FACS6 
[1] Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Minnesota;Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology;Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University;Division of Audiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati;Barrows Neurosurgical Clinic;Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati
关键词: cochlear implants;    evaluation process;    treatment pathways;   
DOI  :  10.1002/lio2.546
学科分类:环境科学(综合)
来源: Wiley
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Objectives• Determine the proportion of patients starting the cochlear implant evaluation(CIE) process proceeding to cochlear implantation.• Determine which patient factors are associated with undergoing cochlear implantationMethods: Retrospective case series of all patients scheduled for a CIE within a tertiary academic neurotology practice between January 1, 2014 and April 30, 2016.Management pathways of patients undergoing CIE were examined.Results: Two hundred thirty-seven adult patients were scheduled for CIE during the studyperiod. Two hundred twenty-six patients started the evaluation process, and 203 patientscompleted full evaluation. Of patients that completed CIE, 166/203 (82%) met criteria forimplantation and 37/203 (18%) did not meet criteria. Fifty-nine patients out of 166 patients(36%) meeting criteria did not receive implants and 107/166 (64%) underwent implantation,yielding an overall implantation rate of 47% (107/226) among patients scheduled for CIE.Common reasons for deferring CI among candidates included failure to show up for preoperative appointment (24%), choosing hearing aids as an alternative (22%), patient refusal(21%) and insurance issues (17%). Overall, CIE led to a new adjunctive hearing device (CI orhearing aid) in 113 (113/203, 56%) cases.Conclusion: Fifty-six (113/203) percent of patients who underwent CIE at an academic medical center underwent CI surgery or received an adjunctive hearing device,but 36% (59/166) of candidates did not receive a CI. Patients who forewent CIdespite meeting candidacy criteria did so due to cost/insurance issues, or due to preference for auditory amplification rather than CI.

【 授权许可】

CC BY|CC BY-NC-ND   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202302050004053ZK.pdf 492KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:6次 浏览次数:1次