The difference between the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale and the Brief Resilience Scale when assessing resilience: confirmatory factor analysis and predictive effects

Global Mental Health

article

Yun-Ci Ye¹  Chia-Huei Wu²  Tzu-Yun Huang³  Cheng-Ta Yang³ 

[1] Department of Somatics and Sport Leisure Industry, College of Humanities, National Taitung University;Management Department, Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds;Department of Psychology, National Cheng Kung University

关键词: Brief Resilience Scale;    confirmatory factor analysis;    Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale;    depression;    life satisfaction;    resilience;   

DOI  :  10.1017/gmh.2022.38

学科分类：化石学

来源: Bioscientifica Ltd.

【 摘 要 】

Background The Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) and the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) are two scales widely used to measure resilience. Although both scales seek to assess an individual's ability to recover from and adapt to disruptions or stressful events, they can capture different aspects of resilience. While the CD-RISC focuses on resources that can help individuals to recover from and adapt to disruptions or stressful events, the BRS directly measures one's ability to bounce back or be resilient. The aim of this study is to better understand resilience through empirically examining the differences between the CD-RISC and the BRS.

【 授权许可】

CC BY|CC BY-NC-SA|CC BY-NC-ND