A Systematic Review of the Development and Implementation of Needs-Based Palliative Care Tools in Heart Failure and Chronic Respiratory Disease

Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

article

Amy Waller¹  Breanne Hobden²  Kristy Fakes¹  Katherine Clark³ 

[1] Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, College of Health Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle;Hunter Medical Research Institute;Northern Sydney Local Health District;Northern Clinical School, The University of Sydney;Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital

关键词: palliative care;    lung disease;    heart failure;    needs assessment;    psychometrics;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fcvm.2022.878428

学科分类：地球科学(综合)

来源: Frontiers

【 摘 要 】

Background The impetus to develop and implement tools for non-malignant patient groups is reflected in the increasing number of instruments being developed for heart failure and chronic respiratory diseases. Evidence syntheses of psychometric quality and clinical utility of these tools is required to inform research and clinical practice. Aims This systematic review examined palliative care needs tools for people diagnosed with advanced heart failure or chronic respiratory diseases, to determine their: (1) psychometric quality; and (2) acceptability, feasibility and clinical utility when implemented in clinical practice. Methods Systematic searches of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane and PsycINFO from database inception until June 2021 were undertaken. Additionally, the reference lists of included studies were searched for relevant articles. Psychometric properties of identified measures were evaluated against pre-determined and standard criteria. Results Eighteen tools met inclusion criteria: 11 were developed to assess unmet patient palliative care needs. Of those, 6 were generic, 4 were developed for heart failure and 1 was developed for interstitial lung disease. Seven tools identified those who may benefit from palliative care and include general and disease-specific indicators. The psychometric qualities of the tools varied. None met all of the accepted criteria for psychometric rigor in heart failure or respiratory disease populations. There is limited implementation of needs assessment tools in practice. Conclusion Several tools were identified, however further validation studies in heart failure and respiratory disease populations are required. Rigorous evaluation to determine the impact of adopting a systematic needs-based approach for heart failure and lung disease on the physical and psychosocial outcomes of patients and carers, as well as the economic costs and benefits to the healthcare system, is required.

【 授权许可】

CC BY