期刊论文详细信息
Frontiers in Medicine
A Combined CRISP3 and SPINK1 Prognostic Grade in EPS-Urine and Establishment of Models to Predict Prognosis of Patients With Prostate Cancer
article
Lizhu Chen1  Enchong Zhang2  Johnny Guan3  Zhengjie Chen2  Jianfeng Ye2  Wangmin Liu2  Jieqian He2  Bo Yin2  Yongsheng Song2  Mo Zhang2 
[1] Department of Ultrasound, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University;Department of Urology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University;Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California
关键词: CRISP3;    SPINK1;    biomarker;    EPS-urine;    prognostic model;   
DOI  :  10.3389/fmed.2022.832415
学科分类:社会科学、人文和艺术(综合)
来源: Frontiers
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background Prostate cancer (PCa) is characterized by significant heterogeneity. Thus, novel prognostic indicators are required to improve prognosis and treatment. Methods Cysteine rich secretory protein 3 (CRISP3) and serine peptidase inhibitor Kazal type 1 (SPINK1) levels in expressed prostatic secretion (EPS)-urine collected during digital rectal examination of 496 patients histologically diagnosed with PCa were detected via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A combined CRISP3 and SPINK1 prognostic grade (CSPG) was defined using cut-off values from receiver operating characteristic curves. Log-rank Kaplan-Meier survival curves investigated differences in prognosis between groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses investigated the CSPG relationship with biochemical recurrence (BCR), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Three prognostic models were developed and validated. Conclusions CRISP3 and SPINK1 levels increased with Gleason score progression, pathological T stage, and metastasis status. CSPG in EPS-urine, which was an effective independent prognostic variable, accurately predicted the prognosis of patients with PCa. Three clinical prognostic models using the CSPG for BCR, CSS, and OS were developed and validated.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202301300009437ZK.pdf 3467KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次