Odontoid fractures: impact of age and comorbidities on surgical decision making

BMC Surgery

Magnus Mejlænder-Evjensvold¹  Tor Brommeland²  Hege Linnerud²  Marianne Efskind Harr²  Mads Aarhus²  Jalal Mirzamohammadi²  Christina Teisner Høstmælingen²  Pål Nicolay Fougner Rydning²  Nils Christian Utheim²  Pål Rønning²  Håvard Ølstørn²  Eirik Helseth³  Syed Ali Mujtaba Rizvi³ 

[1] Department of Neuroradiology, Oslo University Hospital;Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital;Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo;

关键词: Spinal fractures/epidemiology;    Odontoid process/injury;    Age factors;    Comorbidity;    Risk factors;    Spinal fractures/surgery;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12893-020-00893-7

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background Surgical fixation is recommended for type II and III odontoid fractures (OFx) with major translation of the odontoid fragment, regardless of the patient’s age, and for all type II OFx in patients aged ≥50 years. The level of compliance with this recommendation is unknown, and our hypothesis is that open surgical fixation is less frequently performed than recommended. We suspect that this discrepancy might be due to the older age and comorbidities among patients with OFx. Methods We present a prospective observational cohort study of all patients in the southeastern Norwegian population (3.0 million) diagnosed with a traumatic OFx in the period from 2015 to 2018. Results Three hundred thirty-six patients with an OFx were diagnosed, resulting in an overall incidence of 2.8/100000 persons/year. The median age of the patients was 80 years, and 45% were females. According to the Anderson and D’Alonzo classification, the OFx were type II in 199 patients (59%) and type III in 137 patients (41%). The primary fracture treatment was rigid collar alone in 79% of patients and open surgical fixation in 21%. In the multivariate analysis, the following parameters were significantly associated with surgery as the primary treatment: independent living, less serious comorbidities prior to the injury, type II OFx and major sagittal translation of the odontoid fragment. Conversion from external immobilization alone to subsequent open surgical fixation was performed in 10% of patients. Significant differences the in conversion rate were not observed between patients with type II and III fractures. The level of compliance with the treatment recommendations for OFx was low. The main deviation was the underuse of primary surgical fixation for type II OFx. The most common reasons listed for choosing primary external immobilization instead of primary surgical fixation were an older age and comorbidities. Conclusion Major comorbidities and an older age appear to be significant factors contributing to physicians’ decision to refrain from the surgical fixation of OFx. Hence, comorbidities and age should be considered for inclusion in the decision tree for the choice of treatment for OFx in future guidelines.

【 授权许可】

Unknown