Investigate the carbon footprints of three intermediate flooring systems: Cross-laminated timber, solid concrete, and hollow-core precast concrete

Istrazivanja i projektovanja za privredu

Abu Qadourah Jenan¹  Alrwashdeh Saad S.²  Al-Falahat Ala'a M.² 

[1] Mutah University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Architecture and Building Technology, Al-Karak, Jordan;Mutah University, Faculty of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering Department, Al-Karak, Jordan;

关键词: sustainable materials;    cross-laminated timber;    life-cycle assessment;    environmental impact;    cradle-to-gate;    embodied energy;    greenhouse gas emissions;   

DOI  :  10.5937/jaes0-32783

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

This paper evaluates and compares the embodied energy and embodied carbon using a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach for three different intermediate floor structures, all of which use prefabricated materials-cross-laminated timber (CLT), precast hollow-core concrete, and solid concrete-to decide which floor construction materials have less environmental impact for use in the construction of a semi-detached house in the UK. The Inventory of Carbon & Energy (ICE) and the Carbon Calculator tool were used to calculate the carbon footprint from "cradle to grave" to determine whether the use of a CLT solution provides improved environmental performance over the traditional concrete solutions. The carbon footprint results indicate that the use of a hollow-core precast concrete floor system emits less carbon than the other two systems, although the concrete requires more fossil fuel input than the timber during the manufacturing process, so based on this, the footprint from cradle to gate for the timber was expected to be the less than that of the concrete. However, the results show the opposite; this is because of the differences in the material quantities needed in each system.

【 授权许可】

Unknown