Interference with the patient-physician relationship

Southwest Journal of Pulmonary and Critical Care

关键词: American Academy of Family Physicians;    American Academy of Pediatrics;    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists;    American College of Physicians;    American College of Surgeons;    Florida Firearm Owners’ Privacy Act;    fracking;    physician autonomy;    physician mandates;    patient-physician relationship;   

DOI  :  

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

No abstract available. Article truncated at 150 words. “Life is like a boomerang. Our thoughts, deeds and words return to us sooner or later, with astounding accuracy.”-Brant M. Bright, former project leader with IBM A recent sounding board in the New England Journal of Medicine discussed legislative interference with the patient-physician relationship (1).The authors, the executive staff leadership of the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Physicians, and the American College of Surgeons believe that legislators should abide by principles that put patients’ best interests first. Critical to achieving this goal is respect for the importance of scientific evidence, patient autonomy, and the patient-physician relationship. According to the authors, lawmakers are increasingly intruding into the realm of medical practice, often to satisfy political agendas without regard to established, evidence-based guidelines for care. The article goes on to cite examples including: The Florida ….

【 授权许可】

Unknown