From Radical Translation to Radical Interpretation and Back

Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology

关键词: Bayesian decision theory;    empathy;    empirical semantics;    radical interpretation;    radical translation;    truth;    rationality;   

DOI  :  

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Both Quine and Davidson put forth programs of empirical semantics satisfying the conditions that characterize the so-called “standpoint of interpretation.” Quine’s less ambitious program of radical translation rests upon two buttresses: causality and empathy. Davidson’s more ambitious program of radical interpretation replaces causality with truth and empathy with rationality. Although the replacement of causality with intersubjective truth seems to me to be a fully justified move, I nevertheless contend that it is more realistic to develop the work of interpretation drawing upon Quine’s less ambitious requirement of empathy than upon Davidson’s view of human agency as rational agency. In order to substantiate this contention, I present an argument to the effect that Davidson’s characterization of human agency as rational is not compatible with his other requirement that truth should pro-vide the essential link connecting speech with environment and action.

【 授权许可】

Unknown