O DIÁLOGO ENTRE O ACESSO À JUSTIÇA E O CAPS III

LexCult

Pedro Wagner Assed Pereira¹  Rosemary Fonseca Santos²  Lusanir de Sousa Carvalho³ 

[1] Defensoria Pública da União;Secretaria de Saúde de Nova Iguaçu (SEMUS);Universidade Veiga de Almeida;

关键词: mental health;    judiciary;    families;    autonomy;   

DOI  :  10.30749/2594-8261.v2n3p231-243

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

ThisstudypresentstheinsertionofaFederalPublicDefendertogether with the multiprofessional team in a group composed of family members and users of a CAPS III device, in view of the increasing number of users who had applications for benefits dismissed by social security in this device. By causing growth in the number of resources with overload to family members in the care of the user. The objective of this work is to discuss the impact of this situation in the perspective of care overload. Thisresearchhadaqualitativecharacter,madethroughobservationparticipantin meetingswiththefamilygroupsduringtwoyears,withlegalsupportonceevery month. Fifteen family members of the CAPS III family group, who had the benefit of continuingcare(BPC)canceledand/orthosewhorequestedthe benefit,were absentforthisreason.Ofthe15relativesthattheDPUfiledalawsuit,10ofthem were able to review the benefits, 3 of them had the benefit denied and only 2 families hadthecase filed bythelocalcourt. Withtheinclusion oflegalguidanceofferedto users and their respective families, we see new possibilities for intervention transforming the city's eyes and attitudes towards those suffering from psychological distress, minimizing the impacts presented by the family's overload of care.

【 授权许可】

Unknown