Development of the Soekarno–Hatta International Airport Rail Link Project Using the Value Engineering Method: Creating Value for Money

Makara Journal of Technology

Mohammed Ali Berawi¹  Abdur Rohim Boy Berawi¹  Suyono Dikun¹  Jade Sjafrecia Petroceany¹  Bambang Susantono¹  Perdana Miraj¹  Tommy Ilyas¹  Herawati Zetha Rahman²  Teuku Yuri Zagloel³ 

[1] Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia;Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Pancasila, Jakarta Selatan 12640, Indonesia;Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty ofEngineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia;

关键词: airport railway, life cycle cost, transportation, value engineering, value for money;   

DOI  :  10.7454/mst.v18i3.2952

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Soekarno–Hatta Airport is the main gateway for international flights to Greater Jakarta. Its accessibility depends on the inter-city and Sedyatmo toll roads, which causes congestion in peak hours, leading to uncertainty about travel times. The Soekarno–Hatta International Airport Rail Link (SHIARL) is proposed as an alternative mass transportation project, which is expected to provide accessibility and mobility for people and goods to and from the airport. Previously, the project was unattractive to private investors as it was technically and financially unfeasible. Therefore, this research aims to improve the feasibility of the Soekarno-Hatta International Airport Rail Link (SHIARL) by using a value-engineering approach to create maximum value for money for the project. This research combines quantitative and qualitative methods. Questionnaire surveys are distributed to various stakeholders in the project, and a focus-group discussion (FGD) is conducted. The results identified additional, innovative functions through the integration of the Mass Rapid Transit (MRT), flood control, telecommunications, and development in the downtown area around the station. The life-cycle cost analysis confirmed the increased value for money because of the project’s additional functions, including a positive Net Present Value (NPV). Moreover, the findings showed that the internal rate of return (IRR) was 3% higher than the original single-function project.

【 授权许可】

Unknown