Who is the culprit: Is pest infestation responsible for crop yield losses close to semi‐natural habitats?

Ecology and Evolution

Jasmin Joshi¹  Larissa Raatz²  Karin Pirhofer Walzl³  Marina E. H. Müller³  Christoph Scherber⁴ 

[1] Berlin‐Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB) Berlin Germany;Institute of Biochemistry and Biology Universität PotsdamUniversität Potsdam Potsdam Germany;Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) e.V Müncheberg Germany;Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig (ZFMK) Centre for Biodiversity Monitoring Bonn Germany;

关键词: arable weeds;    cereal leaf beetle;    fungal pathogens;    herbivory;    structural equation model;    wheat;   

DOI  :  10.1002/ece3.8046

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Semi‐natural habitats (SNHs) are becoming increasingly scarce in modern agricultural landscapes. This may reduce natural ecosystem services such as pest control with its putatively positive effect on crop production. In agreement with other studies, we recently reported wheat yield reductions at field borders which were linked to the type of SNH and the distance to the border. In this experimental landscape‐wide study, we asked whether these yield losses have a biotic origin while analyzing fungal seed and fungal leaf pathogens, herbivory of cereal leaf beetles, and weed cover as hypothesized mediators between SNHs and yield. We established experimental winter wheat plots of a single variety within conventionally managed wheat fields at fixed distances either to a hedgerow or to an in‐field kettle hole. For each plot, we recorded the fungal infection rate on seeds, fungal infection and herbivory rates on leaves, and weed cover. Using several generalized linear mixed‐effects models as well as a structural equation model, we tested the effects of SNHs at a field scale (SNH type and distance to SNH) and at a landscape scale (percentage and diversity of SNHs within a 1000‐m radius). In the dry year of 2016, we detected one putative biotic culprit: Weed cover was negatively associated with yield values at a 1‐m and 5‐m distance from the field border with a SNH. None of the fungal and insect pests, however, significantly affected yield, neither solely nor depending on type of or distance to a SNH. However, the pest groups themselves responded differently to SNH at the field scale and at the landscape scale. Our findings highlight that crop losses at field borders may be caused by biotic culprits; however, their negative impact seems weak and is putatively reduced by conventional farming practices.

【 授权许可】

Unknown