Characteristic of Tumor Regrowth After Gamma Knife Radiosurgery and Outcomes of Repeat Gamma Knife Radiosurgery in Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas

Frontiers in Oncology

Yanli Li¹  Lisha Wu²  Junyi Fu³  Tingting Quan⁴  Xi Li⁵  Shunyao Liang⁶  Jinxiu Yu⁶  Yinhui Deng⁶  Minyi Huang⁶  Linhui Cao⁷ 

[1] Department of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China;Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China;Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China;Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China;Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China;Department of Radiotherapy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China;Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China;

关键词: gamma knife;    radiosurgery;    regrowth;    pituitary adenoma;    aggressive;    nonfunctioning;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fonc.2021.627428

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

ObjectiveThis study aimed to report the characteristic of tumor regrowth after gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) and outcomes of repeat GKRS in nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs).Design and MethodsThis retrospective study consisted of 369 NFPA patients treated with GKRS. The median age was 45.2 (range, 7.2–84.0) years. The median tumor volume was 3.5 (range, 0.1–44.3) cm3.ResultsTwenty-four patients (6.5%) were confirmed as regrowth after GKRS. The regrowth-free survivals were 100%, 98%, 97%, 86% and 77% at 1, 3, 5, 10 and 15 year, respectively. In multivariate analysis, parasellar invasion and margin dose (<12 Gy) were associated with tumor regrowth (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.125, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.318–7.410, p = 0.010 and HR = 3.359, 95% CI = 1.347–8.379, p = 0.009, respectively). The median time of regrowth was 86.1 (range, 23.2–236.0) months. Previous surgery was associated with tumor regrowth out of field (p = 0.033). Twelve patients underwent repeat GKRS, including regrowth in (n = 8) and out of field (n = 4). Tumor shrunk in seven patients (58.3%), remained stable in one (8.3%) and regrowth in four (33.3%) with a median repeat GKRS margin dose of 12 (range, 10.0–14.0) Gy. The actuarial tumor control rates were 100%, 90%, 90%, 68%, and 68% at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 years after repeat GKRS, respectively.ConclusionsParasellar invasion and tumor margin dose (<12 Gy) were independent risk factors for tumor regrowth after GKRS. Repeat GKRS might be effective on tumor control for selected patients. For regrowth in field due to relatively insufficient radiation dose, repeat GKRS might offer satisfactory tumor control. For regrowth out of field, preventing regrowth out of field was the key management. Sufficient target coverage and close follow-up might be helpful.

【 授权许可】

Unknown