Reply to Hammer, M.R. A Response to Punti and Dingel’s Critique of the Validity of the Intercultural Development Inventory for BIPOC Students. Comment on “Punti, G.; Dingel, M. Rethinking Race, Ethnicity, and the Assessment of Intercultural Competence in Higher Education. Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 110”

Education Sciences

Molly Dingel¹  Gemma Punti² 

[1] Center for Learning Innovation, University of Minnesota Rochester, Rochester, MN 55904, USA;College of Individualized and Interdisciplinary Studies, Metropolitan State University, Saint Paul, MN 55106, USA;

关键词: BIPOC;    validity;    IDI;    intercultural competence;    structural inequality;    higher education;   

DOI  :  10.3390/educsci12030180

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Hammer claims that the IDI has been validated for BIPOC in the US, but after careful re-examination of the data we presented, we reiterate that there is no evidence of this validation. The studies provided by Hammer reveal how the development of the IDI instrument and its validation focused on international cultural experiences not on cultural diversity within the US. There was no validity testing done on a racially diverse sample of U.S. Americans, and our qualitative data questions the validity for BIPOC individuals from the US.

【 授权许可】

Unknown