In vitro activity of cefiderocol and comparators against Gram-negative bacterial isolates from a series of surveillance studies in England: 2014–2018

Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance

Anne Santerre Henriksen¹  Abid Hussain¹  Malcolm Bain²  Vanya Gant³  Christopher Longshaw⁴ 

[1] Corresponding authors. Tel.: [phone];tel.: [phone].;University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK;University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK;

关键词: Resistance;    Epidemiology;    Carbapenem resistance;    Gram-negative;    Surveillance;   

DOI  :  

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

ABSTRACT:Objectives: The prevalence of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) demonstrating extensive, multiple antimicrobial resistance is increasing in England, leaving few treatment choices. Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore cephalosporin approved in Europe for the treatment of aerobic GNB infections in adults with limited treatment options. We report pooled data for a clinical isolate set collected in England between 2014–2018. Methods: MICs were determined by broth microdilution according to International Organization for Standardization guidelines. Cefiderocol susceptibility was tested using iron-depleted cation-adjusted Muller–Hinton broth. Susceptibility rates were based on EUCAST breakpoints. In the absence of a species-specific breakpoint, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoints were used. Results: Of 1886 isolates from England [74.1% Enterobacterales (18.7% Escherichia coli, 17.2% Klebsiella pneumoniae), 25.9% non-fermenters (18.4% Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 3.7% Acinetobacter baumannii)], 98.7% were cefiderocol-susceptible. Cefiderocol susceptibility in Enterobacterales (99.0%) was significantly (P < 0.01) greater than ceftolozane/tazobactam (94.3%), but similar to meropenem (99.3%) and ceftazidime/avibactam (99.4%). Overall, cefiderocol susceptibility (98.0%) in non-fermenters was significantly (P < 0.01) higher than comparators (range, 84.5–92.4%). Susceptibility to cefiderocol was 98.3–99.6% by infection source and was significantly (P < 0.01) greater than comparators for isolates from patients with nosocomial pneumonia (cefiderocol, 98.3%; comparators range, 79.8–93.8%). Excluding intrinsically meropenem-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, 47/1846 isolates (2.5%) were meropenem-resistant. A high proportion of meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa were susceptible to cefiderocol (95.0%). All S. maltophilia isolates (40/40) were cefiderocol-susceptible. Conclusion: A substantial proportion of clinical isolates from England, representing a wide range of pathogens across multiple infection sources, was cefiderocol-susceptible. Cefiderocol retained activity against meropenem-resistant strains.

【 授权许可】

Unknown