From a Three-Legged Stool to a Three-Dimensional World: Integrating Rights, Gender and Indigenous Knowledge into Sustainability Practice and Law

Sustainability

Mariaelena Huambachano¹  ClaudiaIrene Calderón¹  Sumudu Atapattu¹  Anna Snider²  MarieJosée Paula Houénou³  ValerieJo Stull⁴  LoriDiPrete Brown⁴  Andrea Monzón⁵ 

[1] 4W Initiative–Women and Wellbeing in Wisconsin and the World, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA;Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL 61820, USA;Founder of WESISAH, C40 City adviser, 22 BP 757 Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire;Global Health Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA;MealFlour Director of Programs, Quetzaltenango 09001, Guatemala;

关键词: sustainable development;    human rights;    gender equity;    local and Indigenous knowledge;    de-growth;    planetary health;   

DOI  :  10.3390/su12229521

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

“Sustainable Development” has come a long way since the World Commission on Environment and Development first popularized the term in 1987. Virtually everyone is now familiar with the term Sustainable Development, from states to multinational corporations, and from affluent communities in the Global North to impoverished communities in the Global South. It received a new lease of life in 2015 when the United Nations General Assembly adopted Agenda 2030 and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It is recognized that sustainable development requires an inter-disciplinary, multi-level, and bottom-up approach, and that this ideal is easy to state but difficult to operationalize. Pursuant to deliberations at an international workshop at the University of Wisconsin-Madison¹, which aimed at fostering the exchange of ideas among diverse experts and developing solutions for effective inclusion of women and youth in climate change response strategies, we propose an innovative, practical three-dimensional model that enhances sustainability theory and practice with cross-cutting integration of human rights, gender equity, and Indigenous and local knowledge. We evaluate the utility of the model in two ways: First, we analyze how the model informs current approaches to environmental sustainability and human wellbeing including the SDGs, agroecology, de-growth principles, and planetary health metrics. Then, we explore the feasibility and added value of the approach through seven case studies from Guatemala, Sri Lanka, Malawi, Peru, Côte D’Ivoire, and Aotearoa – New Zealand. We conclude that the proposed model is congruent with current theory and practice. It builds on existing principles by identifying and addressing gaps. It enables practical action in a variety of settings and fosters a more integrated approach to sustainable wellbeing for humanity and our earth. We recommend continued development of this theoretical framework and related guidelines for program design, implementation and evaluation.

【 授权许可】

Unknown