期刊论文详细信息
Animals
Agreement of High-Definition Oscillometry (HDO) and Invasive Blood Pressure Measurements at a Metatarsal Artery in Isoflurane-Anaesthetised Horses
Julia Reiners1  Julien Delarocque2  Nicole Verhaar2  Lara Twele2  Mike Noll3  Julia Tünsmeyer4  Sabine B. R. Kästner4  Stephan Neudeck4 
[1] AniCura Duisburg-Asterlagen Gmbh, Dr.-Detlev-Karsten-Rohwedder-Str. 11, 47228 Duisburg, Germany;Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bünteweg 9, 30559 Hannover, Germany;Evidensia Tierärztliche Klinik für Kleintiere Norderstedt GmbH, Kabels Stieg 41, 22850 Norderstedt, Germany;Small Animal Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bünteweg 9, 30559 Hannover, Germany;
关键词: equine;    anaesthesia;    monitoring;    blood pressure;    high-definition oscillometry;    HDO;   
DOI  :  10.3390/ani12030363
来源: DOAJ
【 摘 要 】

High-definition oscillometry (HDO) over the metatarsal artery (MA) in anaesthetised horses has not yet been evaluated. This study aimed to assess agreement between HDO and invasive blood pressure (IBP) at the metatarsal artery, and to evaluate compliance with the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine (ACVIM) consensus guidelines. In this experimental study, 11 horses underwent general anaesthesia for an unrelated, terminal surgical trial. Instrumentation included an IBP catheter in one and an HDO cuff placed over the contralateral MA, as well as thermodilution catheters. Systolic arterial pressure (SAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), and cardiac output were measured simultaneously. Normotension (MAP 61–119 mmHg) was maintained during the surgical study. Subsequently, hypotension (MAP ≤ 60 mmHg) and hypertension (MAP ≥ 120 mmHg) were induced pharmacologically. For MAP, the agreement between HDO and IBP was acceptable during normotension, while during hypotension and hypertension, IBP was overestimated and underestimated by HDO, respectively. The monitor failed to meet most ACVIM validation criteria. Consequently, if haemodynamic compromise or rapid blood pressure changes are anticipated, IBP remains preferable.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:1次