Comparison of Survival Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Surgery and Open Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

Cancers

I.-Ning Chen¹  Hsueh-Yu Mu¹  J.-Timothy Qiu¹  Wei-Min Liu¹  I.-Te Wang¹  Ching-Wen Chang¹  Yen-Hsieh Chiu¹ 

[1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110301, Taiwan;

关键词: cervical cancer;    hysterectomy;    laparotomy radical hysterectomy;    minimally invasive surgery;    laparoscopic surgery;    robotic-assisted surgery;   

DOI  :  10.3390/cancers14092117

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Objectives: To compare the survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and laparotomy radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving women who received a radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer, stage IA1 with lymphovascular invasion, IA2, IB1, IB2, or IIA from 2008 to 2016. Clinicopathologic and perioperative outcomes were compared using appropriate statistical methodologies. Results: Oncologic survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Among the 105 cases identified, 58 (55.2%) and 47 (44.8%) women underwent MIS and open radical hysterectomy, respectively. Over a median follow-up period of 62 months, women who underwent MIS and open radical hysterectomy had a 5-year overall survival rate of 87.9% and 89.4% (p = 0.845) and a 5-year disease-free survival rate of 82.5% and 86.7% (p = 0.624), respectively. Conclusions: For early-stage cervical cancer, patients who underwent MIS radical hysterectomy had survival outcomes that were comparable to those who underwent open surgery at our institute.

【 授权许可】

Unknown