Medical dissertation basics: analysis of a course of study for medical students

GMS Journal for Medical Education

Kühl, Michael¹  Kühl, Susanne J.¹  Griegel, Sophia¹  Schneider, Achim² 

[1] University of Ulm, Medical Faculty, Institute for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Ulm, Germany;University of Ulm, Medical Faculty, Office of the Dean of Studies, Ulm, Germany;

关键词: dissertation;    doctoral thesis;    scientific curriculum;    doctoral supervision;    scientific competency development;    online teaching;   

DOI  :  10.3205/zma001547

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Background: Although the majority of medical students in Germany pursue a doctorate, only a portion of them receive a standardized scientific training, which is reflected in the quality issues seen in medical doctoral theses. The course Medical Dissertation Basics was conceptualized and scientifically monitored in order to support medical doctoral students on the one hand and to improve the quality of their scientific work on the other.Methodology: The course consists of three modules. Module I, which is an introductory module, covers time and writing management and addresses how to approach literature and the principles of scientific work as well as the chapters required in a dissertation and the dissertation presentation and defense. In the practical module II, doctoral students write sections of their dissertation chapters and receive feedback via peer and expert reviews. Module III includes training on dissertation presentations and their defense. For objective analysis purposes, a multiple-choice test was administered before and after module I. Medical students from semesters 2 to 6 served as a control group.Questionnaires were used to subjectively analyze the training and support functions of modules I-III. Results: High participation rates and the fact that the modules were taught numerous times show that doctoral students accept the courses. The objective analysis of module I showed a highly significant knowledge acquisition of the course group (N=55) in contrast to the control group (N=34). The doctoral students rated the course modules I-III with grades between 1.0 and 1.25 (grade A+/A; N=20-65 SD=0-0.44), felt well supported and estimated their learning success as high. Conclusion: The study indicates knowledge acquisition in module I and a high doctoral student satisfaction with all modules. For an objective analysis of modules II-III, a comparison of completed doctoral theses (course participants vs. non-participants) would be appropriate but would only make sense in a few years. Based on the results of our study, we recommend that other faculties implement similar courses.

【 授权许可】

Unknown