COMPARATIVE REFLECTIONS ON THE VINDICATION OF RIGHTS IN BRAZIL

Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual

Ángel R. Oquendo¹ 

[1] University of Connecticut;

关键词: comparative law;    civil procedure;    constitution;    writ of security;    writ of protection;    summary judgment;    temporary restraining order;    habeas corpus;    unconstitutionality suits;    vindication of rights;    legislation;    doctrine;    caselaw;    res judicata;    appeal;    state action;    argentina;    brazil;    mexico;    paraguay;    united states;   

DOI  :  https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2021.59557

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

The present work examines the contrast between the vindication of rights in Brazil and the other countries in the Americas, especially with regard to the writ of security and analogous devices. It scrutinizes the historical development, along with points of convergence and divergence. Furthermore, the discussion contemplates legislation, doctrine, and the caselaw. Thereby, it purports to analyze admissibility, meritoriousness, appealability, preclusion, stare decisis, and the requirement of state action.

【 授权许可】

Unknown