The Influence of Warm-Up on Body Temperature and Strength Performance in Brazilian National-Level Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes

Medicina

BrenoGuilherme de Araújo Tinoco Cabral¹  PauloFrancisco de Almeida-Neto¹  MadsonRodrigo Silva Bezerra²  RobertaBarreto Vasconcelos Resende²  Marcelode Aquino Resende²  GracielleCosta Reis²  MárioC. Marques³  DanielA. Marinho³  HenriqueP. Neiva³  FelipeJ. Aidar⁴  AndersonCarlos Marçal⁴  DihogoGama de Matos⁴  Layannede Oliveira Barros⁴  VictorMachado Reis⁵  NunoDomingos Garrido⁵ 

[1] Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Rio Grande do Norte 59078-970, Brazil;Department of Physical Education, Tiradentes University (UNIT), Aracaju, Sergipe 49010-390, Brazil;Department of Sport Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal;Group of Studies and Research of Performance, Sport, Health and Paralympic Sports (GEPEPS), Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), São Cristovão, Sergipe 49100-000, Brazil;Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development (CIDESD), Trás os Montes and Alto Douro University, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal;

关键词: warm-up;    powerlifting Paralympic;    athletes;    strength;    temperature;   

DOI  :  10.3390/medicina56100538

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Background and Objectives: The effects of warm-up in athletic success have gained strong attention in recent studies. There is, however, a wide gap in awareness of the warm-up process to be followed, especially in Paralympic powerlifting (PP) athletes. This study aimed to analyze different types of warm-up on the physical performance of PP athletes. Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of 12 elite Brazilian PP male athletes (age, 24.14 ± 6.21 years; bodyweight, 81.67 ± 17.36 kg). The athletes performed maximum isometric force (MIF), rate of force development (RFD), and speed test (Vmax) in three different methods of warm-up. Tympanic temperature was used to estimate the central body temperature. Results: A significant difference was observed for MIF in the without warm-up (WW) condition in relation to the traditional warm-up (TW) and stretching warm-up (SW) (p = 0.005, η²_p = 0.454, high effect). On the contrary, no significant differences were observed in RFD, fatigue index (FI) and time in the different types of warm up (p > 0.05). Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in relation to the maximum repetition (p = 0.121, η²_p = 0.275, medium effect) or the maximum speed (p = 0.712, η²_p = 0.033, low effect) between the different types of warm up. In relation to temperature, significant differences were found for the TW in relation to the “before” and “after” conditions. In addition, differences were found between WW in the “after” condition and SW. In addition, WW demonstrated a significant difference in relation to TW in the “10 min later” condition (F = 26.87, p = 0.05, η²_p = 0.710, high effect). Conclusions: The different types of warm-up methods did not seem to provide significant differences in the force indicators in elite PP athletes.

【 授权许可】

Unknown