期刊论文详细信息
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Functional electrical stimulation cycling exercise after spinal cord injury: a systematic review of health and fitness-related outcomes
Sydney E. Valentino1  Glen M. Davis2  Chester H. Ho3  Jan W. van der Scheer4  Victoria L. Goosey-Tolfrey4 
[1] Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University;Discipline of Exercise and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney;Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta;Peter Harrison Centre for Disability Sport, School for Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University;
关键词: Spinal cord injury;    Functional electrical stimulation;    Exercise;    Systematic review;    Clinical practice guidelines;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12984-021-00882-8
来源: DOAJ
【 摘 要 】

Abstract Objectives The objective of this review was to summarize and appraise evidence on functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling exercise after spinal cord injury (SCI), in order to inform the development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Methods PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, and CINAHL were searched up to April 2021 to identify FES cycling exercise intervention studies including adults with SCI. In order to capture the widest array of evidence available, any outcome measure employed in such studies was considered eligible. Two independent reviewers conducted study eligibility screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal using Cochranes’ Risk of Bias or Downs and Black tools. Each study was designated as a Level 1, 2, 3 or 4 study, dependent on study design and quality appraisal scores. The certainty of the evidence for each outcome was assessed using GRADE ratings (‘High’, ‘Moderate’, ‘Low’, or ‘Very low’). Results Ninety-two studies met the eligibility criteria, comprising 999 adults with SCI representing all age, sex, time since injury, lesion level and lesion completeness strata. For muscle health (e.g., muscle mass, fiber type composition), significant improvements were found in 3 out of 4 Level 1–2 studies, and 27 out of 32 Level 3–4 studies (GRADE rating: ‘High’). Although lacking Level 1–2 studies, significant improvements were also found in nearly all of 35 Level 3–4 studies on power output and aerobic fitness (e.g., peak power and oxygen uptake during an FES cycling test) (GRADE ratings: ‘Low’). Conclusion Current evidence indicates that FES cycling exercise improves lower-body muscle health of adults with SCI, and may increase power output and aerobic fitness. The evidence summarized and appraised in this review can inform the development of the first international, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the use of FES cycling exercise in clinical and community settings of adults with SCI. Registration review protocol: CRD42018108940 (PROSPERO)

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次