Evidence on the economic value of end-of-life and palliative care interventions: a narrative review of reviews

BMC Palliative Care

Baptiste Ottino¹  Xhyljeta Luta¹  Joachim Marti¹  Peter Hall²  Joanna Bowden²  Bee Wee³  Joanne Droney⁴  Julia Riley⁴ 

[1] Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne;Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh;Harris Manchester College, University of Oxford;Institute of Global Health Innovation, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London;

关键词: End-of-life care;    Terminal care;    Palliative care;    Cost - effectiveness;    Health care costs;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12904-021-00782-7

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background As the demand for palliative care increases, more information is needed on how efficient different types of palliative care models are for providing care to dying patients and their caregivers. Evidence on the economic value of treatments and interventions is key to informing resource allocation and ultimately improving the quality and efficiency of healthcare delivery. We assessed the available evidence on the economic value of palliative and end-of-life care interventions across various settings. Methods Reviews published between 2000 and 2019 were included. We included reviews that focused on cost-effectiveness, intervention costs and/or healthcare resource use. Two reviewers extracted data independently and in duplicate from the included studies. Data on the key characteristics of the studies were extracted, including the aim of the study, design, population, type of intervention and comparator, (cost-) effectiveness resource use, main findings and conclusions. Results A total of 43 reviews were included in the analysis. Overall, most evidence on cost-effectiveness relates to home-based interventions and suggests that they offer substantial savings to the health system, including a decrease in total healthcare costs, resource use and improvement in patient and caregivers’ outcomes. The evidence of interventions delivered across other settings was generally inconsistent. Conclusions Some palliative care models may contribute to dual improvement in quality of care via lower rates of aggressive medicalization in the last phase of life accompanied by a reduction in costs. Hospital-based palliative care interventions may improve patient outcomes, healthcare utilization and costs. There is a need for greater consistency in reporting outcome measures, the informal costs of caring, and costs associated with hospice.

【 授权许可】

Unknown