期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Bone Oncology
Differential diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in osteolytic lesions
Wenjie Zhang1  Ning Wu2  Xiaomeng Li3  Ying Liu3  Yue Ming3 
[1] Department of PET/CT, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China;Corresponding author at: Department of PET/CT, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.;Department of PET/CT, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China;
关键词: PET/CT;    Fluorodeoxyglucose;    Bone;    Metastasis;    Multiple myeloma;    Osteolytic lesion;   
DOI  :  
来源: DOAJ
【 摘 要 】

Background: Both bone metastases and multiple myeloma (MM) are malignant diseases that can appear osteolytic on imaging and are difficult to differentiate. While positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has been demonstrated useful for the diagnosis of various bone lesions, correlations between PET/CT and histopathology and these diseases are unclear. This retrospective study investigated the optimal cutoff standardized uptake value (SUV) to differentiate MM and bone metastasis. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed osteolytic lesions (n = 344) and suspected malignancy underwent both fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT and biopsy/surgery. FDG uptake and morphologic changes (e.g., soft tissue mass formation) were compared with pathological results. Results: A total of 8896 osteolytic lesions were evaluated. The SUVmax of MM osteolytic lesions (1.6 ± 0.7) was significantly lower than that of bone metastases (5.5 ± 2.7; p = 0.000). The best cutoff SUVmax for differentiating MM and bone metastasis was 2.65 (sensitivity 86.1%, specificity 94.7%; p = 0.000). The SUVmax of bone lesions of soft tissue mass was higher than that for pure osteolytic lesions (p = 0.000). A greater percentage of patients with bone metastasis had a soft tissue mass (7%) than did patients with MM (2%). The mean SUVmax of bone metastases was 5.5 ± 2.7 (0.4–30.4); that of primary tumors was 7.5 ± 4.2 (1.0–28.5). The SUVmax of bone metastases significantly correlated with the SUVmax of primary tumors (r = 0.532; p = 0.000). Conclusions: FDG PET/CT is a valuable tool to differentiate osteolytic lesions. The best cutoff value of SUVmax for differentiating MM from bone metastasis is 2.65. The significant correlation between the SUVmax of bone metastasis and that of primary tumors is helpful for detecting primary tumors.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次