International Journal of Molecular Sciences | |
Comparison of Different Mass Spectrometry Workflows for the Proteomic Analysis of Tear Fluid | |
Shruti Sharma1  Grace Rountree1  Tae Jin Lee1  Joshua Glass1  Wenbo Zhi1  Garrett Jones1  Ashok Sharma1  Mary Sezer2  Lane Ulrich2  Amy Estes2  | |
[1] Center for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA;Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA; | |
关键词: tear film; proteomics; biomarkers; dry eye disease; ocular surface; mass spectrometry; | |
DOI : 10.3390/ijms23042307 | |
来源: DOAJ |
【 摘 要 】
The tear film is a multi-layer fluid that covers the corneal and conjunctival epithelia of the eye and provides lubrication, nutrients, and protection from the outside environment. Tear fluid contains a high concentration of proteins and has thus been recognized as a potential source of biomarkers for ocular disorders due to its proximity to disease sites on the ocular surface and the non-invasive nature of its collection. This is particularly true in the case of dry eye disease, which directly impacts the tear film and its components. Proteomic analysis of tear fluid is challenging mainly due to the wide dynamic range of proteins and the small sample volumes. However, recent advancements in mass spectrometry have revolutionized the field of proteomics enabling unprecedented depth, speed, and accuracy, even with small sample volumes. In this study using the Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid mass spectrometer, we compared four different mass spectrometry workflows for the proteomic analysis of tear fluid collected via Schirmer strips. We were able to establish a method of in-strip protein digestion that identified >3000 proteins in human tear samples from 11 healthy subjects. Our method offers a significant improvement in the number of proteins identified compared to previously reported methods without pooling samples.
【 授权许可】
Unknown