期刊论文详细信息
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
Patient transfers and assistive devices: prospective cohort study on the risk for occupational back injury among healthcare workers
Roger Persson1  Nils Fallentin1  Ole Steen Mortensen1  Andreas Holtermann1  Alex Burdorf1  Markus D Jakobsen1  Thomas Clausen1  Lars L Andersen2 
[1] ;National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkalle 105, DK 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.;
关键词: back;    ergonomics;    cohort study;    nurse;    patient transfer;    occupational risk factor;    back injury;    prospective cohort study;    longitudinal;    eldercare worker;    healthcare worker;    assistive device;    low-back pain;    musculoskeletal disorder;   
DOI  :  10.5271/sjweh.3382
来源: DOAJ
【 摘 要 】

OBJECTIVES: This prospective cohort study investigates work-related risk factors for occupational back injury among healthcare workers. METHODS: The study comprised 5017 female healthcare workers in eldercare from 36 municipalities in Denmark who responded to a baseline and follow-up questionnaire in 2005 and 2006, respectively. Using logistic regression, the odds for occupational back injury (ie, sudden onset episodes) in 2006 from patient transfers in 2005 was modeled. RESULTS: In the total study population, 3.9% experienced back injury during follow-up, of which 0.5% were recurrent events. When adjusting for lifestyle (body mass index, leisure-time physical activity, smoking), work-related characteristics (seniority and perceived influence at work), and history of back pain and injury, daily patient transfers increased the risk for back injury (trend, P=0.03): odds ratio (OR) 1.75 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.05–2.93] for 1–2 transfers per day, OR 1.81 (95% CI 1.14–2.85) for 3–10 transfers per day, and OR 1.56 (95% CI 0.96–2.54) for >10 transfers per day, referencing those with <1 patient transfer on average per day. The population attributable fraction of daily patient transfer for back injury was estimated to be 36%. Among those with daily patient transfer (N=3820), using an assistive device decreased the risk for back injury for “often” and “very often” use [OR 0.59 (95% CI 0.36–0.98) and OR 0.62 (95% CI 0.38–1.00), respectively] referencing those who “seldom” use assistive devices. CONCLUSION: Daily patient transfer was associated with increased risk for back injury among healthcare workers. Persistent use of an assistive device was associated with reduced risk for back injury among healthcare workers with daily patient transfers.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:2次