Epistemic Injustice and Recognition Theory: A New Conversation —Afterword

Feminist Philosophy Quarterly

Miranda Fricker¹ 

[1] The Graduate Center, CUNY;

关键词: Axel Honneth;    recognition,;    misrecognition,;    epistemic injustice;    testimonial injustice;    hermeneutical injustice;   

DOI  :  10.5206/fpq/2018.4.6235

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

The notion of recognition is an ethically potent resource for understanding human relational needs; and its negative counterpart, misrecognition, an equally potent resource for critique. Axel Honneth’s rich account focuses our attention on recognition’s role in securing basic self-confidence, moral self-respect, and self-esteem. With these loci of recognition in place, we are enabled to raise the intriguing question whether each of these may be extended to apply specifically to the epistemic dimension of our agency and selfhood. Might we talk intelligibly—while staying in tune with Honneth’s concepts and their Hegelian key—of a generic idea of epistemic recognition? Such an idea might itself be seen to apply at the same three levels to indicate: first, basic epistemic self-confidence; second, our status as epistemically responsible; and third, a certain epistemic self-esteem that reflects the epistemic esteem we receive from others. The papers in this volume surely sound a chord in the affirmative, and together they steer us towards a multifaceted conception of how epistemic injustice is related to epistemic misrecognition, and indeed how we might construe a positive relation of epistemic recognition.

【 授权许可】

Unknown