| Breast Cancer Research | |
| Blood DNA methylation and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of four prospective cohort studies | |
| Gianluca Severi1  Roger L. Milne2  Dallas English2  Graham G. Giles2  Pierre-Antoine Dugué2  Laura Baglietto3  Annelie Johansson4  James M. Flanagan4  Clara Bodelon5  Eric Karlins5  Joshua N. Sampson5  Belynda Hicks5  Amy Hutchinson5  Montserrat Garcia-Closas5  Melissa C. Southey6  Manuela Assumma7  Silvia Polidoro7  Veronique Chajès8  Srikant Ambatipudi8  Isabelle Romieu8  Cyrille Cuenin8  Zdenko Herceg8  Paolo Vineis9  | |
| [1] CESP (U1018 INSERM, Équipe Générations et Santé), Facultés de médecine Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay;Cancer Epidemiology and Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria;Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa;Division of Cancer, Imperial College London;Divison of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute;Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne;IIGM (Italian Institute for Genomic Medicine);International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC);MRC-PHE Center for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College; | |
| 关键词: Breast cancer risk; Blood DNA methylation; Prospective study; Meta-analysis; | |
| DOI : 10.1186/s13058-019-1145-9 | |
| 来源: DOAJ | |
【 摘 要 】
Abstract Background Environmental and genetic factors play an important role in the etiology of breast cancer. Several small blood-based DNA methylation studies have reported risk associations with methylation at individual CpGs and average methylation levels; however, these findings require validation in larger prospective cohort studies. To investigate the role of blood DNA methylation on breast cancer risk, we conducted a meta-analysis of four prospective cohort studies, including a total of 1663 incident cases and 1885 controls, the largest study of blood DNA methylation and breast cancer risk to date. Methods We assessed associations with methylation at 365,145 CpGs present in the HumanMethylation450 (HM450K) Beadchip, after excluding CpGs that did not pass quality controls in all studies. Each of the four cohorts estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between each individual CpG and breast cancer risk. In addition, each study assessed the association between average methylation measures and breast cancer risk, adjusted and unadjusted for cell-type composition. Study-specific ORs were combined using fixed-effect meta-analysis with inverse variance weights. Stratified analyses were conducted by age at diagnosis (< 50, ≥ 50), estrogen receptor (ER) status (+/−), and time since blood collection (< 5, 5–10, > 10 years). The false discovery rate (q value) was used to account for multiple testing. Results The average age at blood draw ranged from 52.2 to 62.2 years across the four cohorts. Median follow-up time ranged from 6.6 to 8.4 years. The methylation measured at individual CpGs was not associated with breast cancer risk (q value > 0.59). In addition, higher average methylation level was not associated with risk of breast cancer (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.85, 1.05; P = 0.26; P for study heterogeneity = 0.86). We found no evidence of modification of this association by age at diagnosis (P = 0.17), ER status (P = 0.88), time since blood collection (P = 0.98), or CpG location (P = 0.98). Conclusions Our data indicate that DNA methylation measured in the blood prior to breast cancer diagnosis in predominantly postmenopausal women is unlikely to be associated with substantial breast cancer risk on the HM450K array. Larger studies or with greater methylation coverage are needed to determine if associations exist between blood DNA methylation and breast cancer risk.
【 授权许可】
Unknown