Glottal Source Information for Pathological Voice Detection

IEEE Access

N. P. Narendra¹  Paavo Alku¹ 

[1] Department of Signal Processing and Acoustics, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland;

关键词: Pathological voice;    glottal source waveform;    glottal features;    support vector machines;    end-to-end systems;   

DOI  :  10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2986171

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Automatic methods for the detection of pathological voice from healthy speech can be considered as potential clinical tools for medical treatment. This study investigates the effectiveness of glottal source information in the detection of pathological voice by comparing the classical pipeline approach to the end-to-end approach. The traditional pipeline approach consists of a feature extractor and a separate classifier. In the former, two sets of glottal features (computed using the quasi-closed phase glottal inverse filtering method) are used together with the widely used openSMILE features. Using both the glottal and openSMILE features extracted from voice utterances and the corresponding healthy/pathology labels, support vector machine (SVM) classifiers are trained. In building end-to-end systems, both raw speech signals and raw glottal flow waveforms are used to train two deep learning architectures: (1) a combination of convolutional neural network (CNN) and multilayer perceptron (MLP), and (2) a combination of CNN and long short-term memory (LSTM) network. Experiments were carried out using three publicly available databases, including dysarthric (the UA-Speech database and the TORGO database) and dysphonic voices (the UPM database). The performance analysis of the detection system based on the traditional pipeline approach showed best results when the glottal features were combined with the baseline openSMILE features. The results of the end-to-end approach indicated higher accuracies (about 2-3 % improvement in all three databases) when glottal flow was used as the raw time-domain input (87.93 % for UA-Speech, 81.12 % for TORGO and 76.66 % for UPM) compared to using raw speech waveform (85.12 % for UA-Speech, 78.83 % for TORGO and 73.71 % for UPM). The evaluation of both approaches demonstrate that automatic detection of pathological voice from healthy speech benefits from using glottal source information.

【 授权许可】

Unknown