Differences in the Inclusion and Treatment of Terminology in OALD3, OALD4 and OALD8

Lexikos

Marjeta Vrbinc¹  Alenka Vrbinc¹ 

[1] University of Ljubljana;

关键词: definitions;    general dictionaries;    lemma;    monolingual learn­er's dictionaries;    oald3;    oald4;    oald8;    scientific vocabulary;    sense indica­tor;    short cuts;    subject-field labels;    technical vocabulary;   

DOI  :  10.5788/23-1-1224

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

This article deals with the inclusion and treatment of scientific and technical vocabu­lary in the third, fourth and eighth editions of Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary. The comparison of these editions is based on a random sample of 50 pages from OALD8 from the lemma foot to gimmick. The same lemma range was also studied in OALD3 and OALD4. First, dif­ferent ways of indicating terminology were identified: i.e., subject-field labels, definitions and short cuts. Then all the lemmata or their senses marked with a subject-field label were found and a list of all subject-field labels used in this lemma range was compiled to see similarities and differences between individual editions. The comparison showed that the number of subject-field labels in all three editions is almost identical, but the subject-field labels differ from edition to edition. The issue of overly specific labels (e.g., 'anatomy', 'phonetics') and labels that are too broad (e.g., 'science', 'tech­nical') is addressed. The next part of the article is devoted to the changes in the treat­ment of LSP lexical items in these three editions of OALD, from missing labels to changes in labels and ways of indicating terminology by means of definitions and/or short cuts. The conclusion suggests improvements in the subject-field labels themselves, a more consistent way of including subject-field labels even when the definitions indicate the subject field and an improved use of short cuts when the reference is to a certain subject field.

【 授权许可】

Unknown