Integrating Eye- and Mouse-Tracking with Assistant Based Speech Recognition for Interaction at Controller Working Positions

Aerospace

Ioan-Teodor Salomea¹  Jyothsna Adamala²  Oliver Ohneiser³ 

[1] Faculty of Aerospace Engineering,“Politehnica” University of Bucharest, Str. Gh. Polizu No. 1, 1st District, 010737 Bucharest, Romania;Faculty of Informatics, Automotive Software Engineering, Technische Universität Chemnitz, Straße der Nationen 62, 09111 Chemnitz, Germany;German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Flight Guidance, Lilienthalplatz 7, 38108 Braunschweig, Germany;

关键词: air traffic controller;    human machine interaction;    multimodality;    eye-tracking;    mouse-tracking;    automatic speech recognition;   

DOI  :  10.3390/aerospace8090245

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Assistant based speech recognition (ABSR) prototypes for air traffic controllers have demonstrated to reduce controller workload and aircraft flight times as a result. However, two aspects of ABSR could enhance benefits, i.e., (1) the predicted controller commands that speech recognition engines use can be more accurate, and (2) the confirmation process of ABSR recognition output, such as callsigns, command types, and values by the controller, can be less intrusive. Both tasks can be supported by unobtrusive eye- and mouse-tracking when using operators’ gaze and interaction data. First, probabilities for predicted commands should consider controllers’ visual focus on the situation data display. Controllers will more likely give commands to aircraft that they focus on or where there was a mouse interaction on the display. Furthermore, they will more likely give certain command types depending on the characteristics of multiple aircraft being scanned. Second, it can be determined via eye-tracking instead of additional mouse clicks if the displayed ABSR output has been checked by the controller and remains uncorrected for a certain amount of time. Then, the output is assumed to be correct and is usable by other air traffic control systems, e.g., short-term conflict alert. If the ABSR output remains unchecked, an attention guidance functionality triggers different escalation levels to display visual cues. In a one-shot experimental case study with two controllers for the two implemented techniques, (1) command prediction probabilities improved by a factor of four, (2) prediction error rates based on an accuracy metric for three most-probable aircraft decreased by a factor of 25 when combining eye- and mouse-tracking data, and (3) visual confirmation of ABSR output promises to be an alternative for manual confirmation.

【 授权许可】

Unknown