Validation of COSMIC-2-Derived Ionospheric Peak Parameters Using Measurements of Ionosondes

Remote Sensing

Suqin Wu¹  Jiaqi Shi¹  Wang Li¹  Kefei Zhang¹  Peng Sun¹  Shuangshuang Shi¹  Fucheng Song² 

[1] Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China;Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Water and Soil Conservation and Environmental Protection, College of Resources and Environment, Linyi University, Linyi 276000, China;

关键词: COSMIC-2;    data validation;    NmF2;    hmF2;    equatorial ionization anomaly;    geomagnetic storm;   

DOI  :  10.3390/rs13214238

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Although numerous validations for the ionospheric peak parameters values (IPPVs) obtained from the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (COSMIC) have been conducted using ionosonde measurements as a reference, comprehensive evaluations of the quality of the COSMIC-2 data are still undesirable, especially under geomagnetic storm conditions. In this study, the IPPVs measured by ionosondes (Ramey, Boa Vista, Sao Luis, Jicamarca, Cachoeira Paulista, and Santa Maria) during the period 1 October 2019 to 31 August 2021, are used to evaluate the quality of COSMIC-2 data over low-latitude regions of the Americas. The results show that the $N_m{\mathrm{F}}_2$ ($h_m{\mathrm{F}}_2$) from COSMIC-2 agrees well with the ionosonde measurements, and the correlation coefficients for the two sets of data at the above six stations are 0.93 (0.84), 0.91 (0.85), 0.91 (0.88), 0.88 (0.79), 0.96 (0.83), and 0.96 (0.87), respectively. The data quality of COSMIC-2 derived $N_m{\mathrm{F}}_2$ is largely dependent on geomagnetic latitude. It was also found that $N_m{\mathrm{F}}_2$ derived from COSMIC-2 tends to be underestimated over the stations in Boa Vista and Cachoeira Paulista, which are close to the crests of the equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA), whilst that of the other stations is slightly overestimated. A comparison between COSMIC-measured and ionosonde-derived $h_m{\mathrm{F}}_2$ indicates that the former is systematically higher than the latter. In addition, the differences in the two $N_m{\mathrm{F}}_2$ datasets derived from COSMIC-2 and ionosonde measurements at night are generally smaller than those of daytime, when the EIA is well developed, and vice versa for $h_m{\mathrm{F}}_2$, whose RMSE is slightly smaller during daytime (with the exception of Ramey). Furthermore, $N_m{\mathrm{F}}_2$ obtained from COSMIC-2 is shown to perform best in summer at Ramey, Boa Vista, Sao Luis, and Santa Maria, best in winter at Jicamarca and Cachoeira Paulista. Finally, the COSMIC-2 electron densities capture the ionospheric dynamic enhancements under a moderate geomagnetic storm condition very well.

【 授权许可】

Unknown